National ranking · EPA UCMR5
PFAS in Drinking Water by State
Share of UCMR5-tested systems with at least one PFAS detection. Primary ranking requires ≥10 systems tested so a one-system 100% result cannot lead the list; rates are not SDWIS violation rates (different population - see methodology).
- 34.4%
- National UCMR5 detection rate
- 10,252
- Systems tested (UCMR5)
- 26.7%
- Median rate (≥10 tested)
The verdict
Among states with at least 10 systems tested, New Jersey has the highest PFAS detection rate at 65.2%; the #12 cutoff on the chart above is Ohio at 40.8%, and EPA Region 10 — Tribal Water Systems anchors #57 of the complete eligible list at 0% - against a 34.4% national UCMR5 rate.
- 65.2%
- Detection rate, New Jersey
- 40.8%
- #12 chart cutoff to make this list
- 0%
- #57 · bottom of complete eligible list
- 34.4%
- National UCMR5 detection rate
Highest PFAS detection rates (states with ≥10 systems tested)
Share of UCMR5-tested systems with at least one PFAS detection - not SDWIS violation %
- New Jersey
New Jersey
65.2 % detected
- Connecticut
Connecticut
63.5 % detected
- South Carolina
South Carolina
54.9 % detected
- Massachusetts
Massachusetts
54.4 % detected
- Texas
Texas
53.2 % detected
- Rhode Island
Rhode Island
51.7 % detected
- North Carolina
North Carolina
49.8 % detected
- Delaware
Delaware
48.6 % detected
- Florida
Florida
47.3 % detected
- Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
44.5 % detected
- Minnesota
Minnesota
44.4 % detected
- Ohio
Ohio
40.8 % detected
What this shows New Jersey leads eligible states at 65.2% (median 26.7%).
Primary ranking (≥10 systems tested)
Denominator = UCMR5-tested systems only. Floor stated in the lede; #1 carries the small-N caveat even above the floor.
57 states shown
| # | State | Systems Tested | PFAS Detected | Detection Rate | vs median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey(#1 - rate still swings with sample size) | 264 | 172 | 65.2% | +38.5pp |
| 2 | Connecticut | 63 | 40 | 63.5% | +36.8pp |
| 3 | South Carolina | 164 | 90 | 54.9% | +28.2pp |
| 4 | Massachusetts | 263 | 143 | 54.4% | +27.7pp |
| 5 | Texas | 1,147 | 610 | 53.2% | +26.5pp |
| 6 | Rhode Island | 29 | 15 | 51.7% | +25pp |
| 7 | North Carolina | 287 | 143 | 49.8% | +23.1pp |
| 8 | Delaware | 35 | 17 | 48.6% | +21.9pp |
| 9 | Florida | 402 | 190 | 47.3% | +20.6pp |
| 10 | Pennsylvania | 389 | 173 | 44.5% | +17.8pp |
| 11 | Minnesota | 196 | 87 | 44.4% | +17.7pp |
| 12 | Ohio | 346 | 141 | 40.8% | +14.1pp |
| 13 | Puerto Rico | 99 | 38 | 38.4% | +11.7pp |
| 14 | Alabama | 306 | 117 | 38.2% | +11.5pp |
| 15 | Kentucky | 231 | 87 | 37.7% | +11pp |
| 16 | Arizona | 152 | 57 | 37.5% | +10.8pp |
| 17 | Oklahoma | 166 | 61 | 36.7% | +10pp |
| 18 | Maryland | 83 | 30 | 36.1% | +9.4pp |
| 19 | New Hampshire | 51 | 18 | 35.3% | +8.6pp |
| 20 | California | 694 | 231 | 33.3% | +6.6pp |
| 21 | West Virginia | 102 | 34 | 33.3% | +6.6pp |
| 22 | Kansas | 103 | 34 | 33% | +6.3pp |
| 23 | Virginia | 171 | 54 | 31.6% | +4.9pp |
| 24 | Tennessee | 277 | 87 | 31.4% | +4.7pp |
| 25 | Missouri | 230 | 71 | 30.9% | +4.2pp |
| 26 | Georgia | 254 | 77 | 30.3% | +3.6pp |
| 27 | Alaska | 30 | 9 | 30% | +3.3pp |
| 28 | New York | 332 | 98 | 29.5% | +2.8pp |
| 29 | Washington | 247 | 66 | 26.7% | +0pp |
| 30 | Illinois | 487 | 123 | 25.3% | -1.4pp |
| 31 | Wisconsin | 202 | 51 | 25.2% | -1.5pp |
| 32 | Maine | 41 | 10 | 24.4% | -2.3pp |
| 33 | Indiana | 229 | 55 | 24% | -2.7pp |
| 34 | Colorado | 163 | 37 | 22.7% | -4pp |
| 35 | Iowa | 152 | 32 | 21.1% | -5.6pp |
| 36 | EPA Region 9 — Tribal Water Systems | 41 | 8 | 19.5% | -7.2pp |
| 37 | North Dakota | 38 | 7 | 18.4% | -8.3pp |
| 38 | Louisiana | 265 | 47 | 17.7% | -9pp |
| 39 | Nevada | 57 | 10 | 17.5% | -9.2pp |
| 40 | Navajo Nation | 13 | 2 | 15.4% | -11.3pp |
| 41 | Oregon | 125 | 18 | 14.4% | -12.3pp |
| 42 | South Dakota | 49 | 7 | 14.3% | -12.4pp |
| 43 | New Mexico | 72 | 10 | 13.9% | -12.8pp |
| 44 | Michigan | 318 | 44 | 13.8% | -12.9pp |
| 45 | Idaho | 60 | 8 | 13.3% | -13.4pp |
| 46 | Nebraska | 53 | 7 | 13.2% | -13.5pp |
| 47 | Utah | 129 | 16 | 12.4% | -14.3pp |
| 48 | Montana | 45 | 5 | 11.1% | -15.6pp |
| 49 | EPA Region 6 — Tribal Water Systems | 18 | 2 | 11.1% | -15.6pp |
| 50 | Wyoming | 33 | 3 | 9.1% | -17.6pp |
| 51 | Vermont | 37 | 3 | 8.1% | -18.6pp |
| 52 | EPA Region 8 — Tribal Water Systems | 13 | 1 | 7.7% | -19pp |
| 53 | EPA Region 5 — Tribal Water Systems | 13 | 1 | 7.7% | -19pp |
| 54 | Arkansas | 172 | 10 | 5.8% | -20.9pp |
| 55 | Hawaii | 45 | 2 | 4.4% | -22.3pp |
| 56 | Mississippi | 238 | 9 | 3.8% | -22.9pp |
| 57 | EPA Region 10 — Tribal Water Systems | 10 | 0 | 0% | -26.7pp |
Small tested base (<10 systems)
Listed for completeness, not for leadership claims. A 1-of-1 detection reads as 100% without meaning statewide prevalence.
| State / territory | Systems Tested | PFAS Detected | Detection Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| American Samoa | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| Guam | 5 | 3 | 60% |
| Northern Mariana Islands | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| EPA Region 1 — Tribal Water Systems | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| US Virgin Islands | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| EPA Region 7 — Tribal Water Systems | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| EPA Region 4 — Tribal Water Systems | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| EPA Region 2 — Tribal Water Systems | 2 | 0 | 0% |
Download the SDWIS/UCMR5 state landscape snapshot cited on this page: sdwis-state-landscape.csv (same CSV as /statistics, CC0).
Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws on EPA UCMR5 PFAS occurrence data; rates use the UCMR5 tested population only. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.