Is Brunswick County Water System water safe to drink?

Brunswick County Water System (PWS ID: NC0410045) has 168 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. PFAS contamination has been detected in UCMR5 testing, with 9 PFAS compounds found. EPA SDWIS lists this system's service population as 142,227 people using Surface Water sources.

How many people does Brunswick County Water System serve?

EPA SDWIS reports that Brunswick County Water System serves 142,227 people (this public water system's service population, not the municipal population of Bolivia or any other city). It is a Local-owned system using Surface Water water sources with 63,212 service connections. The operator address is listed in Bolivia, North Carolina.

What type of violations does Brunswick County Water System have?

Brunswick County Water System has 168 total violations: 39 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 119 monitoring/reporting violations, and 31 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.

Has PFAS been detected in Brunswick County Water System water?

Yes. UCMR5 testing detected 9 PFAS compounds in Brunswick County Water System's water supply: PFBS, PFHpA, PFHxS, PFOS, PFOA, and others. PFAS are persistent "forever chemicals" that do not break down in the environment.

What water source does Brunswick County Water System use?

Brunswick County Water System uses Surface Water as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Where does Brunswick County Water System sit among U.S. public water systems?

According to EPA SDWIS population_served among sitemap-advertised systems (serving 500+), Brunswick County Water System ranks #310 of 29,740 by people served, and #13 of 713 in North Carolina. Ordinals use population_served DESC among systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). See /methodology#corpus-placement.

How does Brunswick County Water System's violation count compare nationally?

Brunswick County Water System has 168 recorded EPA SDWIS violations, fewer than 17% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500 or more people nationwide (the same sitemap cohort used for the corpus-placement ranking above). 83% of that cohort has fewer violations than Brunswick County Water System. A system can have zero recorded violations and still be actively monitored, and a high violation count often reflects a system that reports thoroughly, not necessarily one with worse water.

States → North Carolina

Community Water System · PWS NC0410045

Brunswick County Water System

Operator location Bolivia, North Carolina - 23% of 168 violations are health-based (upper-third health share (> 23%)); surface water source; 142,227 served per SDWIS.

Compiled by PlainWater · May 15, 2026

142,227
People served (this PWS) Larger third of systems: 168
EPA violations (this PWS) Upper third of systems: 39
Health-based (this PWS) Upper third by health-based share: 9 PFAS
UCMR5 (this PWS) Upper third of PFAS-detected systems

Follow published updates (RSS)

Brunswick County Water System standing, high SDWIS violation third

23% of 168 recorded violations are health-based - upper-third health share (> 23%). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 23% is upper-third health share (> 23%). UCMR5: upper-third PFAS panel (> 4 compounds). Population rank #310 of 29,740 among systems serving 500+.

The verdict

Brunswick County Water System sits in the upper third of the sitemap cohort by violation count (168), so the tables below sample a dense compliance trail rather than a near-clean ledger. Population served is large (142,227; larger served population (> 3,309)), so household exposure scale sits behind the violation mix. Health-based share is 23% - most of this ledger is MCL or treatment-technique exceedance. UCMR5 detected 9 PFAS compounds (upper-third PFAS panel (> 4 compounds)).

#310 of 29,740
Population · /systems: #13 of 713
Population · NC: 168
Total EPA violations on record: 23%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)

Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.

PFAS Detected

9 PFAS "forever chemicals" detected in testing under EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program.

Water Safety Score

12/100

Brunswick County Water System

Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.

Health-based violations F

EPA SDWIS health-based violations on record (MCL, MRDL, treatment technique)

Monitoring & reporting violations F

129

Non-health SDWIS violations (monitoring, reporting, and other compliance)

PFAS contamination F

0.0124 µg/L

Highest PFAS compound level detected in UCMR5 testing

System Details

System Type: Community
Owner Type: Local
Connections: 63,212
County: Brunswick
School/Daycare: No
MCL Violations: 8
Monitoring Violations: 119
Treatment Tech Violations: 31

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant	Category	Count	Latest
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule	TT	17	2016
CARBON, TOTAL	MR	12	2024
Chlorite	MR	11	2019
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule	MR	10	2016
Lead and Copper Rule	TT	10	2003
Chlorite	MCL	8	2014
Endrin	MR	7	1990
2,4-D	MR	7	1990
2,4,5-TP	MR	7	1990
Toxaphene	MR	7	1990
BHC-GAMMA	MR	7	1990
Methoxychlor	MR	7	1990
Coliform (TCR)	MR	5	2013
TTHM	MR	5	2024
Chloramine	MR	5	2013
Surface Water Treatment Rule	TT	4	1996
Consumer Confidence Rule	Other	4	2001
Chlorine dioxide	MR	4	2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	MR	4	2024
Fluoride	MR	3	1988
Mercury	MR	3	1988
Selenium	MR	3	1988
Cadmium	MR	3	1988
Chromium	MR	3	1988
Nitrate	MR	2	1988
Barium	MR	2	1988
Arsenic	MR	2	1988

Violation Count vs. the National Corpus

Brunswick County Water System has 168 recorded EPA violations, 83% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 17% carry more. 23% of this system's own violations are health-based (39 of 168), and it ranks #310 of 29,740 by population served among that same cohort.

EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus

Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)

168 Higher than most more violations than 83% of 29,740 water systems

the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15

How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems

Brunswick County Water System plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.

30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release.

How to read this

Each dot is one public water system; the highlighted dot is Brunswick County Water System. A system to the right has more recorded violations; a system higher up has a larger share of those violations classified health-based rather than monitoring or reporting.

Rare but serious: few violations, but most of them are health-based.
Frequent, mostly paperwork: many violations, but mostly monitoring or reporting, not health-based.
Clean record: below-median on both counts, the tinted corner.

View all 30 systems as a list

City of Ballinger: 372 violations, 85% health-based
Nooksack Valley Water Association: 16 violations, 31% health-based
Montgomery Co RWD 12: 7 violations, 29% health-based
Irvin Water District #6: 11 violations, 27% health-based
Ticonderoga WD: 47 violations, 26% health-based
Pine Valley Plantation: 37 violations, 24% health-based
Brunswick County Water System: 168 violations, 23% health-based (this system)
McLouth, City Of: 29 violations, 17% health-based
Kipling Oaks 1: 25 violations, 16% health-based
South Deerfield Water Supply District: 96 violations, 16% health-based
Sunset Ridge Water District: 82 violations, 15% health-based
Orange Water Dept: 136 violations, 14% health-based
Mount Pleasant Water Sys #1: 167 violations, 11% health-based
Lake Gibson Estates: 42 violations, 2% health-based
Benson Culinary Improvement District: 212 violations, 1% health-based
Conemaugh Twp Muni Auth: 567 violations, 1% health-based
Miccosukee Service Plaza: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Brazoria - Fort Bend Counties MUD 3: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Tanglewilde Thompson Place 600: 2 violations, 0% health-based
Center Water Co: 5 violations, 0% health-based
Spring Mills Elem School/Hvs: 9 violations, 0% health-based
Great Bend Industrial Park: 14 violations, 0% health-based
Glen Park Village: 19 violations, 0% health-based
Camp Is-Sho-Da: 22 violations, 0% health-based
Hamilton: 33 violations, 0% health-based
Town of Welaka: 54 violations, 0% health-based
Township of Blairstown Dpw: 61 violations, 0% health-based
McIntosh Water & Fire Pro Authority: 71 violations, 0% health-based
Clarkdale Municipal Water System: 114 violations, 0% health-based
Eureka Water Association: 273 violations, 0% health-based

PFAS Testing Results (UCMR5)

Results from EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. 26 of 174 samples detected PFAS.

Contaminant	Date	Result	MRL	Status
6:2 FTS	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
ADONA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBS	8/3/2023	5.20 ppt	3.00 ppt	Detected
PFHpA	8/3/2023	3.70 ppt	3.00 ppt	Detected
PFHxS	8/3/2023	4.10 ppt	3.00 ppt	Detected
PFNA	8/3/2023	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFOS	8/3/2023	12.40 ppt	4.00 ppt	Detected
PFOA	8/3/2023	7.70 ppt	4.00 ppt	Detected
PFDA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFDoA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHxA	8/3/2023	7.50 ppt	3.00 ppt	Detected
PFUnA	8/3/2023	<2.00 ppt	2.00 ppt	Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS	8/3/2023	<2.00 ppt	2.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFMPA	8/3/2023	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBA	8/3/2023	7.10 ppt	5.00 ppt	Detected
4:2 FTS	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
8:2 FTS	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFPeA	8/3/2023	8.30 ppt	3.00 ppt	Detected
PFEESA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
NFDHA	8/3/2023	<20.00 ppt	20.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFPeS	8/3/2023	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHpS	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFTA	8/3/2023	<8.00 ppt	8.00 ppt	Not Detected
HFPO-DA	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFMBA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFTrDA	8/3/2023	<7.00 ppt	7.00 ppt	Not Detected
NEtFOSAA	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
NMeFOSAA	8/3/2023	<6.00 ppt	6.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFOS	8/3/2023	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHxA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
NMeFOSAA	8/3/2023	<6.00 ppt	6.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHpA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHxS	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFNA	8/3/2023	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFDA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFOA	8/3/2023	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFDoA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFUnA	8/3/2023	<2.00 ppt	2.00 ppt	Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS	8/3/2023	<2.00 ppt	2.00 ppt	Not Detected
ADONA	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
HFPO-DA	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBA	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFPeS	8/3/2023	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
NEtFOSAA	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBS	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
6:2 FTS	8/3/2023	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFTA	8/3/2023	<8.00 ppt	8.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHpS	8/3/2023	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected

Health-based violations on Brunswick County Water System

39 health-based rows in the tables above map to MCL or treatment-technique exceedances, verify each contaminant code on the federal SDWIS report for NC0410045.

EPA SDWIS · PWS NC0410045 NC primacy agency

Sources: EPA SDWIS · North Carolina DEQ, Public Water Supply Section

Nationwide peers

168 violations · 142,227 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.

Cross-state systems with comparable violation load

Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by total SDWIS violations on record.

4 peers

Cross-state systems with similar served population

Nearest cross-state systems by EPA SDWIS population_served (same 500+ sitemap gate).

4 peers

What to do with Brunswick County Water System

Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.

See how every tracked system in North Carolina compares on the same EPA violation measures. North Carolina systems
Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems

EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Compiled by PlainWater, Drinking Water Quality Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.