Is Hoke Co Regional Water System water safe to drink?

Hoke Co Regional Water System (PWS ID: NC0347025) has 1523 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. PFAS contamination has been detected in UCMR5 testing, with 3 PFAS compounds found. EPA SDWIS lists this system's service population as 36,640 people using Groundwater sources.

How many people does Hoke Co Regional Water System serve?

EPA SDWIS reports that Hoke Co Regional Water System serves 36,640 people (this public water system's service population, not the municipal population of Raeford or any other city). It is a Local-owned system using Groundwater water sources with 13,856 service connections. The operator address is listed in Raeford, North Carolina.

What type of violations does Hoke Co Regional Water System have?

Hoke Co Regional Water System has 1,523 total violations: 28 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 1,466 monitoring/reporting violations, and 2 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.

Has PFAS been detected in Hoke Co Regional Water System water?

Yes. UCMR5 testing detected 3 PFAS compounds in Hoke Co Regional Water System's water supply: PFBS, PFOS, PFHxS. PFAS are persistent "forever chemicals" that do not break down in the environment.

What water source does Hoke Co Regional Water System use?

Hoke Co Regional Water System uses Groundwater as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Where does Hoke Co Regional Water System sit among U.S. public water systems?

According to EPA SDWIS population_served among sitemap-advertised systems (serving 500+), Hoke Co Regional Water System ranks #1,523 of 29,740 by people served, and #44 of 713 in North Carolina. Ordinals use population_served DESC among systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). See /methodology#corpus-placement.

How does Hoke Co Regional Water System's violation count compare nationally?

Hoke Co Regional Water System has 1,523 recorded EPA SDWIS violations, fewer than 0% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500 or more people nationwide (the same sitemap cohort used for the corpus-placement ranking above). 100% of that cohort has fewer violations than Hoke Co Regional Water System. A system can have zero recorded violations and still be actively monitored, and a high violation count often reflects a system that reports thoroughly, not necessarily one with worse water.

States → North Carolina

Community Water System · PWS NC0347025

Hoke Co Regional Water System

Operator location Raeford, North Carolina - larger served population (> 3,309) at 36,640 people served; 1,523 SDWIS violations on record from groundwater sources.

Compiled by PlainWater · May 15, 2026

36,640
People served (this PWS) Larger third of systems: 1,523
EPA violations (this PWS) Upper third of systems: 28
Health-based (this PWS) Middle third by health-based share: 3 PFAS
UCMR5 (this PWS) Middle third of PFAS-detected systems

Follow published updates (RSS)

Hoke Co Regional Water System standing, high SDWIS violation third

36,640 people served (SDWIS) - larger served population (> 3,309). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 2% is middle-third health share (≤ 23%). UCMR5: middle-third PFAS panel (≤ 4 compounds). Population rank #1,523 of 29,740 among systems serving 500+.

The verdict

Hoke Co Regional Water System sits in the upper third of the sitemap cohort by violation count (1,523), so the tables below sample a dense compliance trail rather than a near-clean ledger. Population served is large (36,640; larger served population (> 3,309)), so household exposure scale sits behind the violation mix. Health-based share is 2% (middle-third health share (≤ 23%)). UCMR5 detected 3 PFAS compounds (middle-third PFAS panel (≤ 4 compounds)).

#1,523 of 29,740
Population · /systems: #44 of 713
Population · NC: 1,523
Total EPA violations on record: 2%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)

Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.

PFAS Detected

3 PFAS "forever chemicals" detected in testing under EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program.

Water Safety Score

28/100

Hoke Co Regional Water System

Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.

Health-based violations F

EPA SDWIS health-based violations on record (MCL, MRDL, treatment technique)

Monitoring & reporting violations F

1,495

Non-health SDWIS violations (monitoring, reporting, and other compliance)

PFAS contamination A-

0.0048 µg/L

Highest PFAS compound level detected in UCMR5 testing

System Details

System Type: Community
Owner Type: Local
Connections: 13,856
County: Hoke
School/Daycare: No
MCL Violations: 26
Monitoring Violations: 1,466
Treatment Tech Violations: 2

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant	Category	Count	Latest
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)	MR	36	2015
Chlordane	MR	36	2015
Heptachlor epoxide	MR	36	2015
Toxaphene	MR	36	2015
BHC-GAMMA	MR	36	2015
Endrin	MR	36	2015
Methoxychlor	MR	36	2015
Heptachlor	MR	36	2015
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene	MR	33	2013
Vinyl chloride	MR	33	2013
Styrene	MR	33	2013
Toluene	MR	33	2013
Tetrachloroethylene	MR	33	2013
1,1,2-Trichloroethane	MR	33	2013
Trichloroethylene	MR	33	2013
Carbon tetrachloride	MR	33	2013
1,2-Dichloroethane	MR	33	2013
p-Dichlorobenzene	MR	33	2013
Xylenes, Total	MR	33	2013
o-Dichlorobenzene	MR	33	2013
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene	MR	33	2013
Benzene	MR	33	2013
1,2-Dichloropropane	MR	33	2013
1,1,1-Trichloroethane	MR	33	2013
1,1-Dichloroethylene	MR	33	2013
DICHLOROMETHANE	MR	33	2013
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene	MR	33	2013
CHLOROBENZENE	MR	33	2013
Ethylbenzene	MR	33	2013
Thallium, Total	MCL	21	2005

Violation Count vs. the National Corpus

Hoke Co Regional Water System has 1,523 recorded EPA violations, 100% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 0% carry more. 2% of this system's own violations are health-based (28 of 1,523), and it ranks #1,523 of 29,740 by population served among that same cohort.

EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus

Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)

1,523 Higher than most more violations than 99%+ of 29,740 water systems

the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15

How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems

Hoke Co Regional Water System plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.

30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release.

How to read this

Each dot is one public water system; the highlighted dot is Hoke Co Regional Water System. A system to the right has more recorded violations; a system higher up has a larger share of those violations classified health-based rather than monitoring or reporting.

Rare but serious: few violations, but most of them are health-based.
Frequent, mostly paperwork: many violations, but mostly monitoring or reporting, not health-based.
Clean record: below-median on both counts, the tinted corner.

View all 30 systems as a list

City of Ballinger: 372 violations, 85% health-based
Nooksack Valley Water Association: 16 violations, 31% health-based
Montgomery Co RWD 12: 7 violations, 29% health-based
Irvin Water District #6: 11 violations, 27% health-based
Ticonderoga WD: 47 violations, 26% health-based
Pine Valley Plantation: 37 violations, 24% health-based
McLouth, City Of: 29 violations, 17% health-based
Kipling Oaks 1: 25 violations, 16% health-based
South Deerfield Water Supply District: 96 violations, 16% health-based
Sunset Ridge Water District: 82 violations, 15% health-based
Orange Water Dept: 136 violations, 14% health-based
Mount Pleasant Water Sys #1: 167 violations, 11% health-based
Lake Gibson Estates: 42 violations, 2% health-based
Hoke Co Regional Water System: 1,523 violations, 2% health-based (this system)
Benson Culinary Improvement District: 212 violations, 1% health-based
Conemaugh Twp Muni Auth: 567 violations, 1% health-based
Miccosukee Service Plaza: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Brazoria - Fort Bend Counties MUD 3: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Tanglewilde Thompson Place 600: 2 violations, 0% health-based
Center Water Co: 5 violations, 0% health-based
Spring Mills Elem School/Hvs: 9 violations, 0% health-based
Great Bend Industrial Park: 14 violations, 0% health-based
Glen Park Village: 19 violations, 0% health-based
Camp Is-Sho-Da: 22 violations, 0% health-based
Hamilton: 33 violations, 0% health-based
Town of Welaka: 54 violations, 0% health-based
Township of Blairstown Dpw: 61 violations, 0% health-based
McIntosh Water & Fire Pro Authority: 71 violations, 0% health-based
Clarkdale Municipal Water System: 114 violations, 0% health-based
Eureka Water Association: 273 violations, 0% health-based

PFAS Testing Results (UCMR5)

Results from EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. 9 of 754 samples detected PFAS.

Contaminant	Date	Result	MRL	Status
HFPO-DA	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFEESA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFOS	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHpS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFPeA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
NFDHA	6/17/2024	<20.00 ppt	20.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFMPA	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
8:2 FTS	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
4:2 FTS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
6:2 FTS	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBA	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFMBA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
ADONA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS	6/17/2024	<2.00 ppt	2.00 ppt	Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFUnA	6/17/2024	<2.00 ppt	2.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHpA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHxA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFDoA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFOA	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFNA	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHxS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFPeS	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
NEtFOSAA	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFDA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFTrDA	6/17/2024	<7.00 ppt	7.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFTA	6/17/2024	<8.00 ppt	8.00 ppt	Not Detected
NMeFOSAA	6/17/2024	<6.00 ppt	6.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFMBA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
NEtFOSAA	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFTrDA	6/17/2024	<7.00 ppt	7.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFTA	6/17/2024	<8.00 ppt	8.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHpS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFPeS	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFEESA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
NMeFOSAA	6/17/2024	<6.00 ppt	6.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFPeA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFMPA	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
8:2 FTS	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
4:2 FTS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
6:2 FTS	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFOA	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
NFDHA	6/17/2024	<20.00 ppt	20.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFBA	6/17/2024	<5.00 ppt	5.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHxS	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFOS	6/17/2024	<4.00 ppt	4.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFHpA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected
PFDA	6/17/2024	<3.00 ppt	3.00 ppt	Not Detected

Population served record for Hoke Co Regional Water System

EPA SDWIS lists 36,640 people served and 13,856 connections for this PWS, confirm the service-area footprint on the federal report before comparing to municipal census totals.

EPA SDWIS · PWS NC0347025 NC primacy agency

Sources: EPA SDWIS · North Carolina DEQ, Public Water Supply Section

Nationwide peers

1,523 violations · 36,640 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.

Cross-state systems with comparable violation load

Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by total SDWIS violations on record.

4 peers

Cross-state systems with similar served population

Nearest cross-state systems by EPA SDWIS population_served (same 500+ sitemap gate).

4 peers

What to do with Hoke Co Regional Water System

Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.

See how every tracked system in North Carolina compares on the same EPA violation measures. North Carolina systems
Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems

EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Compiled by PlainWater, Drinking Water Quality Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.