PlainWater
Counties → North Carolina

Martin County, North Carolina

Water Systems
21
Population Served
17,335
Total Violations
1,567
80 health-based
PFAS Detected
1
of 1 tested

Violation Analysis

85.7%
Systems with Violations
74.6
Avg Violations per System
5.1%
Health-Based Violations

Water Source Types

GW
18 systems (86%)
SW
3 systems (14%)

PFAS Contamination

1
Systems Tested
1
PFAS Detected
100.0%
Detection Rate

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are persistent chemicals found in drinking water. The EPA has set enforceable limits for several PFAS compounds under UCMR5 monitoring.

Compliance Snapshot

Martin North Carolina water systems by violation status, EPA SDWIS records.

No violations on record (3) One or more violations (18)

Violation history is cumulative, many flagged systems have already returned to compliance. Detail pages show per-system context.

Water Systems

System Name Population Violations PFAS
Williamston, Town Of 7,650 6 Detected
Martin Co Water & Sewer Dist 2 2,746 649 -
Martin Co Water & Sewer Dist I 2,245 27 -
Robersonville, Town Of 1,445 303 -
Domtar Paper Company - Pulp & Paper 450 43 -
Green Acres Campground 445 0 -
Jamesville, Town Of 440 6 -
Everetts, Town Of 419 52 -
Hamilton, Town Of 408 74 -
Parmele, Town Of 262 39 -
Weyerhaeuser-Southern Lumber 185 21 -
Cedar Branch Baptist Church 175 22 -
Ross Motel 100 185 -
Domtar Paper Company - Rec/Picnic Hut 100 8 -
Robersonville Country Club 90 23 -
Mackey`s Ferry Peanuts& Gifts 75 0 -
Gospel Light Ch of Christ 50 62 -
Domtar Paper Company - Wood Yard 25 45 -
Domtar Paper Co - Mobile Equipment 25 0 -
Martin Co Regional Wasa 0 1 -
Martin Co. Regional Wasa Authority Well 0 1 -

Other Counties in North Carolina

Mecklenburg County
61 systems · 1,181,269 served · 8,081 violations
Wake County
437 systems · 1,145,508 served · 42,422 violations
Guilford County
202 systems · 489,022 served · 30,107 violations
Forsyth County
19 systems · 392,063 served · 2,199 violations
Cumberland County
90 systems · 349,358 served · 9,862 violations
Durham County
50 systems · 329,624 served · 6,257 violations

Drinking Water Guides

Frequently Asked Questions

How many water violations are in Martin County? ▼
Martin County has 1,567 total drinking water violations across 21 water systems, of which 80 are health-based violations. 85.7% of systems have at least one violation.
How many people get water from Martin County systems? ▼
Water systems in Martin County serve approximately 17,335 people through 21 public water systems.
Has PFAS been detected in Martin County water? ▼
Of 1 water systems tested for PFAS in Martin County, 1 had PFAS detected (100.0% detection rate).
What types of water sources supply Martin County? ▼
Water systems in Martin County use GW (18 systems), SW (3 systems) as their primary water sources.
Are health-based violations serious? ▼
Health-based violations indicate that drinking water exceeded Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) set by the EPA or failed treatment technique requirements. 5.1% of Martin County's violations are health-based. Not all violations indicate immediate health risk, but they require corrective action.
Data Sources & Methodology

Drinking water violation data from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS). PFAS testing data from the UCMR5 monitoring program. SDWIS tracks all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Violations are categorized as health-based (Maximum Contaminant Level exceedances, treatment technique failures) or monitoring/reporting violations. Not all violations indicate an immediate health risk.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater Editorial

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.