PlainWater

Loving County, Texas

SDWIS compliance plate

Sheet TX301 · Loving County 3 sys · 492 viol · #3154/3254

VIOL-SEVERE · HEALTH-LOW · RANK-BOTTOM · PHOTO-FINISH · PFAS-NONE · SRC-GW · SYS-TINY · BOOK-MOST

  • VIOL-SEVERE 66.7% flagged
  • HEALTH-LOW 1.6% health
  • RANK-BOTTOM #3154/3254
  • PHOTO-FINISH ±0.0 pp
  • PFAS-NONE No UCMR5 set
  • SRC-GW GW lead 100%
  • SYS-TINY 3 systems
  • BOOK-MOST 6/7 fields

Nearest flagged-rate peer: Howard County (+ 0 pp flagged-rate)

According to EPA SDWIS county population served used on /counties, Loving County ranks #3,154 of 3,254 counties by people served, and #241 of 254 counties in Texas. See methodology · corpus placement.

Loving County standing, lower-flagged corpus third

Flagged-system rate 66.7% is at or below the corpus lower third (≤ 92.7% flagged) across 2,973 counties with ≥3 SDWIS systems . Health-based share 1.6% is health-based share at or below the lower third (≤ 10.3%) . No UCMR5 tests in this extract for Loving County . Population served ranks #3,154 of 3,254 · #241 of 254 in Texas.

Flagged-rate neighbourhood around Loving County

Lowest/highest poles plus in-state counties nearest Loving County on % of SDWIS systems with ≥1 violation. Full ladder: /counties.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Loving · this county · lowest Gillespie · near Donley · near 66.7% 66.7% 74% 74.7% 75% 100%

Source: EPA SDWIS (county aggregates) As of 2026-05-15

Water Systems

System Name Population Violations PFAS
Target Logistics Mentone Wolf Lodge 550 0 -
Target Hospitality Skillman Lodge 440 100 -
Loving County Water System 165 392 -

Compare beyond Texas

Lower-flagged peers for Loving County

Cross-state counties nearest Loving County on flagged-system share (66.7%) and cumulative violation count (492). In-state neighbours stay on the compliance plate above.

Similar flagged-system rate

Nearest cross-state counties by % of SDWIS systems with at least one violation on record.

4 peers

Similar violation load

Nearest cross-state counties by cumulative SDWIS violation count (all systems in the county).

4 peers
Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.