PlainWater

Interactive tool

New Jersey vs Connecticut

Put any two U.S. states side by side on SDWIS violation totals, violation rates, and UCMR5 PFAS detection, straight from EPA public records.

66
States & territories
143,076
Water systems covered
10,559,500
Violations on record

According to EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 public extracts (data vintage 2026-05-15), every figure is an aggregate across public water systems in each state. Violation rate is systems with violations divided by total systems; PFAS rate is detections divided by UCMR5-tested systems. These are registry metrics, not tap-water safety scores. See methodology.

Choose states to compare

Need county-level detail? Use the county compare tool.

Comparison snapshot

New Jersey tracks 3,428 public water systems with 95% carrying at least one SDWIS violation; Connecticut tracks 2,332 systems at 94% violation rate - UCMR5 PFAS detection rates are 65.2% vs 63.5%.

95%
New Jersey violation rate
94%
Connecticut violation rate
65.2%
New Jersey PFAS detection
63.5%
Connecticut PFAS detection
Water systems
Public water systems
3,428
2,332
Population served
9,570,926
2,886,005
Systems with violations
3,256
2,193
Violations
Total violations
204,988
206,662
Health-based violations
22,229
21,779
Violation rate (% of systems)
95%
94%
PFAS (UCMR5)
Systems tested
264
63
Systems with PFAS detected
172
40
PFAS detection rate
65.2%
63.5%
Better relative to comparison Worse relative to comparison

Download the SDWIS/UCMR5 state landscape snapshot cited on this page: sdwis-state-landscape.csv (same CSV as /statistics, CC0).

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. State totals are summed from EPA SDWIS public water-system records in the PlainWater database; PFAS rates use UCMR5-tested systems only. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.