PlainWater
States → Utah

Non-Transient Non-Community Water System · PWS UTAH14062

Delta Egg Farm

Delta, Utah 84624 - drinking water served from groundwater sources to 70 people, tracked in EPA SDWIS and UCMR5.

70
People served
232
EPA violations
2
Health-based
Untested
UCMR5 result

The verdict

EPA records 232 drinking-water violations at Delta Egg Farm, 1% of them health-based - above the Utah per-system average.

232
Total EPA violations on record
1%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)
70
People served by this system
N/A
PFAS compounds detected (UCMR5)

Water Quality Snapshot: Delta Egg Farm

Delta Egg Farm is a private-owned non-transient non-community water system that delivers drinking water to 70 residents in Delta, Utah (Millard County) through 9 service connections. Its water is drawn from groundwater sources. EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System records 232 total violations for this system , of which 2 (1%) are health-based, meaning a contaminant exceeded an EPA Maximum Contaminant Level or a required treatment technique failed. A further 227 monitoring and reporting violations are on file. The most recent violation on record dates to 2023.

The most frequently cited contaminant at this system is Arsenic, recorded in 15 violations (MR). This system has not yet been sampled under EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program, so no PFAS detection data is available here.

Across Utah, EPA tracks 1,068 public water systems serving 3,870,776 people, with 169,784 cumulative violations and 10,671 health-based violations on record. About 98% of systems in the state carry at least one violation, and state-wide the average per system is 159 violations. Statewide, 91 of 129 UCMR5-tested systems have reported PFAS detections (70.5%).

Delta Egg Farm's 232 violations sit above the Utah average.

All figures above are sourced directly from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 public data releases and are updated as EPA publishes new reporting cycles.

Population Served
70
Total Violations
232
Health-Based Violations
2
Water Source
Groundwater

System Details

System Type
Non-Transient Non-Community
Owner Type
Private
Connections
9
County
Millard
School/Daycare
No
MCL Violations
2
Monitoring Violations
227
Treatment Tech Violations
0

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant Category Count Latest
Arsenic MR 15 2021
Revised Total Coliform Rule MON 14 2023
Coliform (TCR) MR 8 2015
BHC-GAMMA MR 6 2008
Methoxychlor MR 6 2008
Toxaphene MR 6 2008
Dalapon MR 6 2008
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate MR 6 2008
Simazine MR 6 2008
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate MR 6 2008
Picloram MR 6 2008
Dinoseb MR 6 2008
Atrazine MR 6 2008
Heptachlor MR 6 2008
Heptachlor epoxide MR 6 2008
2,4-D MR 6 2008
2,4,5-TP MR 6 2008
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) MR 6 2008
LASSO MR 6 2008
Benzo(a)pyrene MR 6 2008
HEXACHLOROBENZENE MR 6 2008
Chlordane MR 6 2008
OXAMYL MR 6 2008
Surface Water Treatment Rule MR 6 2017
Carbofuran MR 6 2008
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene MR 6 2008
Endrin MR 6 2008
Pentachlorophenol MR 6 2008
Lead and Copper Rule MR 4 2019
Nitrate MR 3 2010

Verify This Water System

The figures above are aggregated from EPA's public databases. To verify the underlying records, or to file a complaint, request a Consumer Confidence Report, or check current monitoring status, go directly to the federal and state regulators that enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act for Delta Egg Farm.

Federal Source of Truth

EPA SDWIS, Federal Reports

EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) holds the federal compliance record for every regulated public water system. Open the system-level report by PWS ID:

View PWS ID UTAH14062 on SDWIS

Source: EPA SDWIS Federal Reports Search

State Regulator

Utah Drinking Water Authority

Utah's primacy agency administers the Safe Drinking Water Act locally. Search EPA SDWIS for the current state contact, or use the state's public health or environment department portal.

Find UT regulator via EPA SDWIS

Violation Timeline

Each row links to the EPA SDWIS public record for verification. Cross-reference the contaminant code on EPA's federal report to see violation dates, return-to-compliance status, and enforcement actions.

Year (latest) Contaminant Category Count EPA Record
2023 Revised Total Coliform Rule MON 14 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 8000
2021 Arsenic MR 15 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 1005
2019 Lead and Copper Rule MR 4 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 5000
2017 Surface Water Treatment Rule MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 0200
2015 Coliform (TCR) MR 8 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 3100
2013 Coliform (TCR) MCL 2 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 3100
2010 Nitrate MR 3 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 1040
2008 BHC-GAMMA MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2010
2008 Methoxychlor MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2015
2008 Toxaphene MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2020
2008 Dalapon MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2031
2008 Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2035
2008 Simazine MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2037
2008 Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2039
2008 Picloram MR 6 SDWIS / UTAH14062 / 2040

How Delta Egg Farm Compares

Cross-reference this system's record against state averages and the federal MCL framework for context.

Metric Delta Egg Farm Utah avg Federal benchmark
Total violations 232 159 SDWA compliance, any non-zero count is a recorded breach
Health-based violations 2 10 Indicates a contaminant exceeded a federal MCL
PFAS detection None 70.5% EPA final rule (2024): PFOA/PFOS MCL = 4.0 ppt
Population served 70 3,624 Sizing context for compliance burden

Sources: EPA SDWIS and EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (40 CFR Part 141). State averages computed across 1,068 regulated public water systems in Utah.

Federal MCL reference, Safe Drinking Water Act thresholds ▼
Contaminant Federal MCL / Action Level Note
Lead 0 mg/L (Action Level: 0.015 mg/L) Lead and Copper Rule treatment technique
Arsenic 0.010 mg/L (10 ppb) Health-based MCL since 2006
Total Coliform Treatment technique (RTCR) Indicator organism, monitoring trigger
PFOA / PFOS (PFAS) 4.0 ppt each (final 2024 rule) Compliance deadline 2029 (EPA proposed extending to 2031, not yet final as of May 2026)
Nitrate (as N) 10 mg/L Acute health risk for infants

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Delta Egg Farm water safe to drink? ▼
Delta Egg Farm (PWS ID: UTAH14062) has 232 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing. This system serves 70 people using Groundwater sources.
How many people does Delta Egg Farm serve? ▼
Delta Egg Farm serves 70 people in Delta, Utah. It is a Private-owned system using Groundwater water sources with 9 service connections.
What type of violations does Delta Egg Farm have? ▼
Delta Egg Farm has 232 total violations: 2 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 227 monitoring/reporting violations, and 0 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.
Has PFAS been detected in Delta Egg Farm water? ▼
No PFAS testing data is available for Delta Egg Farm under the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program.
What water source does Delta Egg Farm use? ▼
Delta Egg Farm uses Groundwater as its primary water source. It is classified as a Non-Transient Non-Community Water System, serving the same people for at least 6 months per year.
Where does this data come from? ▼
All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Data Sources: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), Q4 2025. This data is provided for informational purposes only.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater Editorial

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This system's figures are rendered directly from EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.