Community Water System · PWS TX1240001
Jim Hogg County Wcid 2
Operator location Hebbronville, Texas - 84% of 506 violations are health-based (upper-third health share (> 23%)); groundwater source; 5,397 served per SDWIS.
- 5,397
- People served (this PWS) Larger third of systems
- 506
- EPA violations (this PWS) Upper third of systems
- 427
- Health-based (this PWS) Upper third by health-based share
- No PFAS
- UCMR5 (this PWS) Tested, none detected
Jim Hogg County Wcid 2 standing, high SDWIS violation third
84% of 506 recorded violations are health-based - upper-third health share (> 23%). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 84% is upper-third health share (> 23%). UCMR5: UCMR5 tested, none detected. Population rank #7,367 of 29,740 among systems serving 500+.
The verdict
Jim Hogg County Wcid 2 sits in the upper third of the sitemap cohort by violation count (506), so the tables below sample a dense compliance trail rather than a near-clean ledger. Population served is large (5,397; larger served population (> 3,309)), so household exposure scale sits behind the violation mix. Health-based share is 84% - most of this ledger is MCL or treatment-technique exceedance. UCMR5 tested this system and reported no PFAS above the minimum reporting level.
- #7,367 of 29,740
- Population · /systems
- #787 of 3,040
- Population · TX
- 506
- Total EPA violations on record
- 84%
- Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)
Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.
Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.
System Details
- System Type
- Community
- Owner Type
- Local
- Connections
- 1,799
- County
- Jim Hogg
- School/Daycare
- No
- MCL Violations
- 427
- Monitoring Violations
- 46
- Treatment Tech Violations
- 0
Violation History
Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.
| Contaminant | Category | Count | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | MCL | 410 | 2025 |
| Chlorine | MR | 20 | 2011 |
| Public Notice | Other | 17 | 2025 |
| Coliform (TCR) | MR | 16 | 2014 |
| Coliform (TCR) | MCL | 12 | 2010 |
| E. COLI | MR | 9 | 2024 |
| Fluoride | MCL | 5 | 2002 |
| Consumer Confidence Rule | Other | 4 | 2015 |
| Arsenic | Other | 3 | 2001 |
| Lead and Copper Rule | MR | 1 | 1992 |
| Coliform (TCR) | Other | 1 | 1993 |
Violation Count vs. the National Corpus
Jim Hogg County Wcid 2 has 506 recorded EPA violations, 95% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 5% carry more. 84% of this system's own violations are health-based (427 of 506), and it ranks #7,367 of 29,740 by population served among that same cohort.
EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus
Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)
506 Higher than most more violations than 95% of 29,740 water systems
the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15
How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems
Jim Hogg County Wcid 2 plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.
Violation volume vs. health-based share
PFAS Testing Results (UCMR5)
Results from EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. 0 of 174 samples detected PFAS.
| Contaminant | Date | Result | MRL | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFEESA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHpS | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | 9/4/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFTrDA | 9/4/2024 | <7.00 ppt | 7.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| NEtFOSAA | 9/4/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| NMeFOSAA | 9/4/2024 | <6.00 ppt | 6.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFBS | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHpA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHxS | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFNA | 9/4/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFOS | 9/4/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFOA | 9/4/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFDA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFDoA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFPeS | 9/4/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFUnA | 9/4/2024 | <2.00 ppt | 2.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| NFDHA | 9/4/2024 | <20.00 ppt | 20.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 9Cl-PF3ONS | 9/4/2024 | <2.00 ppt | 2.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| ADONA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| HFPO-DA | 9/4/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFBA | 9/4/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 6:2 FTS | 9/4/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 4:2 FTS | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 8:2 FTS | 9/4/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFMPA | 9/4/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFPeA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFMBA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFTA | 9/4/2024 | <8.00 ppt | 8.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHxA | 9/4/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| HFPO-DA | 7/24/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFBS | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHpA | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHxS | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFNA | 7/24/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFOS | 7/24/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFOA | 7/24/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFDA | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFDoA | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFEESA | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHxA | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFUnA | 7/24/2024 | <2.00 ppt | 2.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 11Cl-PF3OUdS | 7/24/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| ADONA | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| NMeFOSAA | 7/24/2024 | <6.00 ppt | 6.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFPeA | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFMPA | 7/24/2024 | <4.00 ppt | 4.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 8:2 FTS | 7/24/2024 | <5.00 ppt | 5.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| 4:2 FTS | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFHpS | 7/24/2024 | <3.00 ppt | 3.00 ppt | Not Detected |
| PFTA | 7/24/2024 | <8.00 ppt | 8.00 ppt | Not Detected |
Health-based violations on Jim Hogg County Wcid 2
427 health-based rows in the tables above map to MCL or treatment-technique exceedances, verify each contaminant code on the federal SDWIS report for TX1240001.
Sources: EPA SDWIS · Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) - Drinking Water Watch
Nationwide peers
506 violations · 5,397 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.
Cross-state systems with comparable violation load
Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by total SDWIS violations on record.
Cross-state systems with similar served population
Nearest cross-state systems by EPA SDWIS population_served (same 500+ sitemap gate).
What to do with Jim Hogg County Wcid 2
Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.
- See how every tracked system in Texas compares on the same EPA violation measures. Texas systems
- Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
- Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems
EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.
Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.