PlainWater

Community Water System · PWS TX1230039

City of Nome

Operator location Nome, Texas - 62% of 1,212 violations are health-based (upper-third health share (> 23%)); surface water source; 825 served per SDWIS.

825
People served (this PWS) Smaller third of systems
1,212
EPA violations (this PWS) Upper third of systems
753
Health-based (this PWS) Upper third by health-based share
Untested
UCMR5 (this PWS) No UCMR5 result
Follow published updates (RSS)

City of Nome standing, high SDWIS violation third

62% of 1,212 recorded violations are health-based - upper-third health share (> 23%). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 62% is upper-third health share (> 23%). Population rank #22,090 of 29,740 among systems serving 500+.

The verdict

City of Nome sits in the upper third of the sitemap cohort by violation count (1,212), so the tables below sample a dense compliance trail rather than a near-clean ledger. Population served is smaller (825; smaller served population (≤ 999)), so each violation row represents a compact service footprint. Health-based share is 62% - most of this ledger is MCL or treatment-technique exceedance. No UCMR5 PFAS test appears for this system in this extract.

#22,090 of 29,740
Population · /systems
#2,468 of 3,040
Population · TX
1,212
Total EPA violations on record
62%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)

Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.

F
Water Safety Score
0/100
City of Nome

Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.

Health-based violations F
753
EPA SDWIS health-based violations on record (MCL, MRDL, treatment technique)
Monitoring & reporting violations F
459
Non-health SDWIS violations (monitoring, reporting, and other compliance)
PFAS contamination N/A
Not UCMR5-tested
Highest PFAS compound level detected in UCMR5 testing

System Details

System Type
Community
Owner Type
Local
Connections
321
County
Jefferson
School/Daycare
No
MCL Violations
409
Monitoring Violations
213
Treatment Tech Violations
344

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant Category Count Latest
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule TT 319 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MCL 217 2022
TTHM MCL 191 2023
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule MR 133 2024
Public Notice Other 86 2025
Surface Water Treatment Rule MR 21 2016
Surface Water Treatment Rule TT 20 2024
CARBON, TOTAL MR 17 2016
Lead and Copper Rule MR 13 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MR 8 2023
TTHM MR 8 2023
Coliform (TCR) MR 5 2015
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS RPT 4 2024
E. COLI MR 4 2008
Revised Total Coliform Rule MON 4 2021
LEAD AND COPPER RULE REVISIONS TT 4 2024
Consumer Confidence Rule Other 2 2012
Coliform (TCR) MCL 1 1993
Lead and Copper Rule TT 1 1995

Violation Count vs. the National Corpus

City of Nome has 1,212 recorded EPA violations, 99% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 1% carry more. 62% of this system's own violations are health-based (753 of 1,212), and it ranks #22,090 of 29,740 by population served among that same cohort.

EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus

Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)

1,212 Higher than most more violations than 99% of 29,740 water systems

the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15

How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems

City of Nome plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.

Violation volume vs. health-based share

30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Total violations (X) and Health-based share (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Frequent and seriousRare but seriousFrequent, mostly paperworkClean record 05001,0001,500 0%20%40%60%80%100% Total violations Health-based share Violation volume vs. health-based share Miccosukee Service Plaza-0, 0%Brazoria - Fort Bend Counties MUD 3-0, 0%Tanglewilde Thompson Place 600-2, 0%Center Water Co-5, 0%Montgomery Co RWD 12-7, 29%Spring Mills Elem School/Hvs-9, 0%Irvin Water District #6-11, 27%Great Bend Industrial Park-14, 0%Nooksack Valley Water Association-16, 31%Glen Park Village-19, 0%Camp Is-Sho-Da-22, 0%Kipling Oaks 1-25, 16%McLouth, City Of-29, 17%Hamilton-33, 0%Pine Valley Plantation-37, 24%Lake Gibson Estates-42, 2%Ticonderoga WD-47, 26%Town of Welaka-54, 0%Township of Blairstown Dpw-61, 0%McIntosh Water & Fire Pro Authority-71, 0%Sunset Ridge Water District-82, 15%South Deerfield Water Supply District-96, 16%Clarkdale Municipal Water System-114, 0%Orange Water Dept-136, 14%Mount Pleasant Water Sys #1-167, 11%Benson Culinary Improvement District-212, 1%Eureka Water Association-273, 0%City of Ballinger-372, 85%Conemaugh Twp Muni Auth-567, 1%City of Nome-1212, 62%
30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release.

Health-based violations on City of Nome

753 health-based rows in the tables above map to MCL or treatment-technique exceedances, verify each contaminant code on the federal SDWIS report for TX1230039.

Sources: EPA SDWIS · Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) - Drinking Water Watch

Nationwide peers

1,212 violations · 825 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.

What to do with City of Nome

Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.

  • See how every tracked system in Texas compares on the same EPA violation measures. Texas systems
  • Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
  • Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems

EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.