PlainWater

Community Water System · PWS SD4600077

Buffalo Gap

Buffalo Gap, South Dakota 57722 - drinking water served from groundwater sources to 126 people, tracked in EPA SDWIS and UCMR5.

126
People served
514
EPA violations
62
Health-based
Untested
UCMR5 result

The verdict

EPA records 514 drinking-water violations at Buffalo Gap, 12% of them health-based - above the South Dakota per-system average.

514
Total EPA violations on record
12%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)
126
People served by this system
N/A
PFAS compounds detected (UCMR5)

Water Quality Snapshot: Buffalo Gap

Buffalo Gap is a local-owned community water system that delivers drinking water to 126 residents in Buffalo Gap, South Dakota (Custer County) through 93 service connections. Its water is drawn from groundwater sources. EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System records 514 total violations for this system , of which 62 (12%) are health-based, meaning a contaminant exceeded an EPA Maximum Contaminant Level or a required treatment technique failed. A further 397 monitoring and reporting violations are on file. The most recent violation on record dates to 2025.

The most frequently cited contaminant at this system is Coliform (TCR), recorded in 73 violations (MR). This system has not yet been sampled under EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program, so no PFAS detection data is available here.

Across South Dakota, EPA tracks 654 public water systems serving 915,901 people, with 56,254 cumulative violations and 8,399 health-based violations on record. About 92% of systems in the state carry at least one violation, and state-wide the average per system is 86 violations. Statewide, 42 of 49 UCMR5-tested systems have reported PFAS detections (85.7%).

Buffalo Gap's 514 violations sit above the South Dakota average.

All figures above are sourced directly from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 public data releases and are updated as EPA publishes new reporting cycles.

Population Served
126
Total Violations
514
Health-Based Violations
62
Water Source
Groundwater

System Details

System Type
Community
Owner Type
Local
Connections
93
County
Custer
School/Daycare
No
MCL Violations
45
Monitoring Violations
397
Treatment Tech Violations
17

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant Category Count Latest
Coliform (TCR) MR 73 2016
Chlorine MR 52 2025
Combined Uranium MCL 34 2007
Lead and Copper Rule MR 27 2023
Revised Total Coliform Rule MON 14 2023
Coliform (TCR) Other 14 1998
Public Notice Other 13 2016
Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule TT 13 2025
Coliform (TCR) MCL 11 2010
Nitrite MR 7 2005
Vinyl chloride MR 4 2006
1,1,1-Trichloroethane MR 4 2006
Ethylbenzene MR 4 2006
DICHLOROMETHANE MR 4 2006
Xylenes, Total MR 4 2006
1,1-Dichloroethylene MR 4 2006
CHLOROBENZENE MR 4 2006
Styrene MR 4 2006
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene MR 4 2006
p-Dichlorobenzene MR 4 2006
1,2-Dichloroethane MR 4 2006
LASSO MR 4 1993
Heptachlor MR 4 1993
Methoxychlor MR 4 1993
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate MR 4 1993
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate MR 4 1993
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene MR 4 1993
Endrin MR 4 1993
Simazine MR 4 1993
Aldicarb MR 4 1993

Verify This Water System

The figures above are aggregated from EPA's public databases. To verify the underlying records, or to file a complaint, request a Consumer Confidence Report, or check current monitoring status, go directly to the federal and state regulators that enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act for Buffalo Gap.

Federal Source of Truth

EPA SDWIS, Federal Reports

EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) holds the federal compliance record for every regulated public water system. Open the system-level report by PWS ID:

View PWS ID SD4600077 on SDWIS

Source: EPA SDWIS Federal Reports Search

State Regulator

South Dakota Drinking Water Authority

South Dakota's primacy agency administers the Safe Drinking Water Act locally. Search EPA SDWIS for the current state contact, or use the state's public health or environment department portal.

Find SD regulator via EPA SDWIS

Violation Timeline

Each row links to the EPA SDWIS public record for verification. Cross-reference the contaminant code on EPA's federal report to see violation dates, return-to-compliance status, and enforcement actions.

Year (latest) Contaminant Category Count EPA Record
2025 Chlorine MR 52 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 0999
2025 Stage 1 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule TT 13 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 0400
2023 Lead and Copper Rule MR 27 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 5000
2023 Revised Total Coliform Rule MON 14 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 8000
2016 Coliform (TCR) MR 73 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 3100
2016 Public Notice Other 13 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 7500
2016 Groundwater Rule TT 4 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 0700
2016 Revised Total Coliform Rule Other 2 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 8000
2010 Coliform (TCR) MCL 11 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 3100
2007 Combined Uranium MCL 34 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 4006
2006 Vinyl chloride MR 4 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 2976
2006 1,1,1-Trichloroethane MR 4 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 2981
2006 Ethylbenzene MR 4 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 2992
2006 DICHLOROMETHANE MR 4 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 2964
2006 Xylenes, Total MR 4 SDWIS / SD4600077 / 2955

How Buffalo Gap Compares

Cross-reference this system's record against state averages and the federal MCL framework for context.

Metric Buffalo Gap South Dakota avg Federal benchmark
Total violations 514 86 SDWA compliance, any non-zero count is a recorded breach
Health-based violations 62 12.8 Indicates a contaminant exceeded a federal MCL
PFAS detection None 85.7% EPA final rule (2024): PFOA/PFOS MCL = 4.0 ppt
Population served 126 1,400 Sizing context for compliance burden

Sources: EPA SDWIS and EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (40 CFR Part 141). State averages computed across 654 regulated public water systems in South Dakota.

Federal MCL reference, Safe Drinking Water Act thresholds
Contaminant Federal MCL / Action Level Note
Lead 0 mg/L (Action Level: 0.015 mg/L) Lead and Copper Rule treatment technique
Arsenic 0.010 mg/L (10 ppb) Health-based MCL since 2006
Total Coliform Treatment technique (RTCR) Indicator organism, monitoring trigger
PFOA / PFOS (PFAS) 4.0 ppt each (final 2024 rule) Compliance deadline 2029 (EPA proposed extending to 2031, not yet final as of May 2026)
Nitrate (as N) 10 mg/L Acute health risk for infants

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Buffalo Gap water safe to drink?
Buffalo Gap (PWS ID: SD4600077) has 514 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing. This system serves 126 people using Groundwater sources.
How many people does Buffalo Gap serve?
Buffalo Gap serves 126 people in Buffalo Gap, South Dakota. It is a Local-owned system using Groundwater water sources with 93 service connections.
What type of violations does Buffalo Gap have?
Buffalo Gap has 514 total violations: 62 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 397 monitoring/reporting violations, and 17 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.
Has PFAS been detected in Buffalo Gap water?
No PFAS testing data is available for Buffalo Gap under the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program.
What water source does Buffalo Gap use?
Buffalo Gap uses Groundwater as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.
Where does this data come from?
All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Data Sources: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), Q4 2025. This data is provided for informational purposes only.
Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater Editorial

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This system's figures are rendered directly from EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.