MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF

Q: Is MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF water safe to drink?

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF (PWS ID: OR4100550) has 197 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing. This system serves 3,501 people using Surface Water sources.

Q: What type of violations does MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF have?

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF has 197 total violations: 0 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 196 monitoring/reporting violations, and 0 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.

Q: Has PFAS been detected in MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF water?

No. MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF was tested for PFAS under the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program and no PFAS contamination was detected.

Q: What water source does MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF use?

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF uses Surface Water as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.

Q: Where does this data come from?

All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Reviewed byPlainWater Editorial, Drinking Water Quality Editorial Team · June 4, 2026

PWS ID: OR4100550 · MYRTLE CREEK, Oregon 97457

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF serves 3,501 people in MYRTLE CREEK, Oregon using Surface Water water sources. It has 197 recorded EPA violations, including 0 health-based violations. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing.

Water Quality Snapshot: MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF is a local-owned community water system that delivers drinking water to 3,501 residents in MYRTLE CREEK, Oregon (Douglas County) through 1,616 service connections. Its water is drawn from surface water sources. EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System records 197 total violations for this system , of which 0 (0%) are health-based — meaning a contaminant exceeded an EPA Maximum Contaminant Level or a required treatment technique failed. A further 196 monitoring and reporting violations are on file. The most recent violation on record dates to 2025.

The most frequently cited contaminant at this system is Surface Water Treatment Rule, recorded in 18 violations (MR). This system was sampled under EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program and no PFAS compounds were detected above the minimum reporting level.

Across Oregon, EPA tracks 2,518 public water systems serving 4,005,242 people, with 206,659 cumulative violations and 20,339 health-based violations on record. About 99% of systems in the state carry at least one violation, and state-wide the average per system is 82.1 violations. MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF's 197 violations sit above the Oregon average. Statewide, 30 of 125 UCMR5-tested systems have reported PFAS detections (24%). All figures above are sourced directly from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 public data releases and are updated as EPA publishes new reporting cycles.

Population Served

3,501

Total Violations

197

Health-Based Violations

Water Source

Surface Water

System Details

System Type: Community
Owner Type: Local
Connections: 1,616
County: Douglas
School/Daycare: No
MCL Violations: 0
Monitoring Violations: 196
Treatment Tech Violations: 0

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant	Category	Count	Latest
Surface Water Treatment Rule	MR	18	2016
Coliform (TCR)	MR	17	2014
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule	MR	6	2025
Endrin	MR	5	2014
BHC-GAMMA	MR	5	2014
Toxaphene	MR	5	2014
Dalapon	MR	5	2014
Diquat	MR	5	2014
Endothall	MR	5	2014
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate	MR	5	2014
OXAMYL	MR	5	2014
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate	MR	5	2014
Picloram	MR	5	2014
Dinoseb	MR	5	2014
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene	MR	5	2014
Carbofuran	MR	5	2014
Heptachlor	MR	5	2014
2,4,5-TP	MR	5	2014
Benzo(a)pyrene	MR	5	2014
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)	MR	5	2014
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE	MR	5	2014
Chlordane	MR	5	2014
Methoxychlor	MR	5	2014
Glyphosate	MR	5	2014
Simazine	MR	5	2014
Atrazine	MR	5	2014
Heptachlor epoxide	MR	5	2014
HEXACHLOROBENZENE	MR	5	2014
Pentachlorophenol	MR	5	2014
LASSO	MR	5	2014

PFAS Testing Results (UCMR5)

Results from EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. 0 of 120 samples detected PFAS.

Contaminant	Date	Result	MRL	Status
PFHxS	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFHxA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFDoA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFDA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFOA	7/17/2023	<0.004 µg/L	0.004 µg/L	Not Detected
PFOS	7/17/2023	<0.004 µg/L	0.004 µg/L	Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS	7/17/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
PFNA	7/17/2023	<0.004 µg/L	0.004 µg/L	Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS	7/17/2023	<0.002 µg/L	0.002 µg/L	Not Detected
PFHpA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFBS	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
NMeFOSAA	7/17/2023	<0.006 µg/L	0.006 µg/L	Not Detected
NEtFOSAA	7/17/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
PFTrDA	7/17/2023	<0.007 µg/L	0.007 µg/L	Not Detected
PFTA	7/17/2023	<0.008 µg/L	0.008 µg/L	Not Detected
PFPeA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFPeS	7/17/2023	<0.004 µg/L	0.004 µg/L	Not Detected
NFDHA	7/17/2023	<0.02 µg/L	0.02 µg/L	Not Detected
PFEESA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFUnA	7/17/2023	<0.002 µg/L	0.002 µg/L	Not Detected
PFMBA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFHpS	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFMPA	7/17/2023	<0.004 µg/L	0.004 µg/L	Not Detected
8:2 FTS	7/17/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
4:2 FTS	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
6:2 FTS	7/17/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
PFBA	7/17/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
HFPO-DA	7/17/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
ADONA	7/17/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
lithium	7/17/2023	<9 µg/L	9 µg/L	Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS	4/12/2023	<0.002 µg/L	0.002 µg/L	Not Detected
NEtFOSAA	4/12/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
PFHpS	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFPeS	4/12/2023	<0.004 µg/L	0.004 µg/L	Not Detected
NFDHA	4/12/2023	<0.02 µg/L	0.02 µg/L	Not Detected
PFEESA	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFMBA	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFPeA	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFMPA	4/12/2023	<0.004 µg/L	0.004 µg/L	Not Detected
8:2 FTS	4/12/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
4:2 FTS	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
6:2 FTS	4/12/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
PFBA	4/12/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
PFTA	4/12/2023	<0.008 µg/L	0.008 µg/L	Not Detected
ADONA	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFTrDA	4/12/2023	<0.007 µg/L	0.007 µg/L	Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS	4/12/2023	<0.005 µg/L	0.005 µg/L	Not Detected
PFUnA	4/12/2023	<0.002 µg/L	0.002 µg/L	Not Detected
PFHxA	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected
PFDoA	4/12/2023	<0.003 µg/L	0.003 µg/L	Not Detected

Verify This Water System

The figures above are aggregated from EPA's public databases. To verify the underlying records — or to file a complaint, request a Consumer Confidence Report, or check current monitoring status — go directly to the federal and state regulators that enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act for MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF.

Federal Source of Truth

EPA SDWIS — Federal Reports

EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) holds the federal compliance record for every regulated public water system. Open the system-level report by PWS ID:

View PWS ID OR4100550 on SDWIS

Source: EPA SDWIS Federal Reports Search

State Regulator

Oregon Drinking Water Authority

Oregon's primacy agency administers the Safe Drinking Water Act locally. Search EPA SDWIS for the current state contact, or use the state's public health or environment department portal.

Find OR regulator via EPA SDWIS

Violation Timeline

Each row links to the EPA SDWIS public record for verification. Cross-reference the contaminant code on EPA's federal report to see violation dates, return-to-compliance status, and enforcement actions.

Year (latest)	Contaminant	Category	Count	EPA Record
2025	Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule	MR	6	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 0300
2016	Surface Water Treatment Rule	MR	18	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 0200
2014	Coliform (TCR)	MR	17	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 3100
2014	Endrin	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2005
2014	BHC-GAMMA	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2010
2014	Toxaphene	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2020
2014	Dalapon	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2031
2014	Diquat	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2032
2014	Endothall	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2033
2014	Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2035
2014	OXAMYL	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2036
2014	Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2039
2014	Picloram	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2040
2014	Dinoseb	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2041
2014	Hexachlorocyclopentadiene	MR	5	SDWIS / OR4100550 / 2042

How MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF Compares

Cross-reference this system's record against state averages and the federal MCL framework for context.

Metric	MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF	Oregon avg	Federal benchmark
Total violations	197	82.1	SDWA compliance — any non-zero count is a recorded breach
Health-based violations	0	8.1	Indicates a contaminant exceeded a federal MCL
PFAS detection	None	24%	EPA final rule (2024): PFOA/PFOS MCL = 4.0 ppt
Population served	3,501	1,591	Sizing context for compliance burden

Sources: EPA SDWIS and EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (40 CFR Part 141). State averages computed across 2,518 regulated public water systems in Oregon.

Federal MCL reference — Safe Drinking Water Act thresholds ▼

Contaminant	Federal MCL / Action Level	Note
Lead	0 mg/L (Action Level: 0.015 mg/L)	Lead and Copper Rule treatment technique
Arsenic	0.010 mg/L (10 ppb)	Health-based MCL since 2006
Total Coliform	Treatment technique (RTCR)	Indicator organism, monitoring trigger
PFOA / PFOS (PFAS)	4.0 ppt each (final 2024 rule)	Compliance deadline 2029
Nitrate (as N)	10 mg/L	Acute health risk for infants

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF water safe to drink? ▼

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF (PWS ID: OR4100550) has 197 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing. This system serves 3,501 people using Surface Water sources.

How many people does MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF serve? ▼

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF serves 3,501 people in MYRTLE CREEK, Oregon. It is a Local-owned system using Surface Water water sources with 1,616 service connections.

What type of violations does MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF have? ▼

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF has 197 total violations: 0 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 196 monitoring/reporting violations, and 0 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.

Has PFAS been detected in MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF water? ▼

No. MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF was tested for PFAS under the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program and no PFAS contamination was detected.

What water source does MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF use? ▼

MYRTLE CREEK, CITY OF uses Surface Water as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.

Where does this data come from? ▼

All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Explore PlainWater

Water in Oregon

All systems in state

All States

Water quality by state

Contaminants

PFAS & other pollutants

Guides

Understanding water quality

Related Data for Oregon

Environmental Data → Natural Hazards → Air Quality → Healthcare Access → Climate Data →

Data Sources: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), Q4 2025. PFAS data from EPA UCMR5 monitoring program (2023-2025). This data is provided for informational purposes only.

Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Browse all → | Rankings →

Data sourced from $official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater Editorial