PlainWater
StatesOhio

Community Water System · PWS OH7003512

Ontario City

Ontario, Ohio 44906 - drinking water served from groundwater sources to 6,656 people, tracked in EPA SDWIS and UCMR5.

6,656
People served
67
EPA violations
0
Health-based
No PFAS
UCMR5 result

The verdict

EPA records 67 drinking-water violations at Ontario City - below the Ohio per-system average.

67
Total EPA violations on record
0%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)
6,656
People served by this system
0
PFAS compounds detected (UCMR5)

Water Quality Snapshot: Ontario City

Ontario City is a local-owned community water system that delivers drinking water to 6,656 residents in Ontario, Ohio (Richland County) through 2,684 service connections. Its water is drawn from groundwater sources. EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System records 67 total violations for this system , of which 0 (0%) are health-based, meaning a contaminant exceeded an EPA Maximum Contaminant Level or a required treatment technique failed. A further 64 monitoring and reporting violations are on file. The most recent violation on record dates to 2018.

The most frequently cited contaminant at this system is Asbestos, recorded in 4 violations (MR). This system was sampled under EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program and no PFAS compounds were detected above the minimum reporting level.

Across Ohio, EPA tracks 4,181 public water systems serving 11,085,226 people, with 288,388 cumulative violations and 52,412 health-based violations on record. About 90% of systems in the state carry at least one violation, and state-wide the average per system is 69 violations. Statewide, 204 of 346 UCMR5-tested systems have reported PFAS detections (59%).

Ontario City's 67 violations sit below the Ohio average.

All figures above are sourced directly from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 public data releases and are updated as EPA publishes new reporting cycles.

Population Served
6,656
Total Violations
67
Health-Based Violations
0
Water Source
Groundwater

System Details

System Type
Community
Owner Type
Local
Connections
2,684
County
Richland
School/Daycare
No
MCL Violations
0
Monitoring Violations
64
Treatment Tech Violations
0

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant Category Count Latest
Asbestos MR 4 1995
Arsenic MR 4 1995
Barium MR 4 1995
Cadmium MR 4 1995
Chromium MR 4 1995
Fluoride MR 4 1995
Mercury MR 4 1995
Nickel MR 4 1995
Selenium MR 4 1995
Thallium, Total MR 4 1995
Coliform (TCR) MR 4 1998
Nitrate MR 4 1999
Beryllium, Total MR 4 1995
CYANIDE MR 4 1995
Antimony, Total MR 4 1995
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U MR 4 1995
Consumer Confidence Rule Other 3 2018

PFAS Testing Results (UCMR5)

Results from EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. 0 of 58 samples detected PFAS.

Contaminant Date Result MRL Status
PFHpA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxS 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS 5/9/2023 <2.00 ppt 2.00 ppt Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS 5/9/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFUnA 5/9/2023 <2.00 ppt 2.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFDoA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
HFPO-DA 5/9/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFBA 5/9/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
6:2 FTS 5/9/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
4:2 FTS 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFNA 5/9/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
8:2 FTS 5/9/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFBS 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFOS 5/9/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFOA 5/9/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFDA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMPA 5/9/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFPeA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMBA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFEESA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
NFDHA 5/9/2023 <20.00 ppt 20.00 ppt Not Detected
PFPeS 5/9/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHpS 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
NMeFOSAA 5/9/2023 <6.00 ppt 6.00 ppt Not Detected
NEtFOSAA 5/9/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFTrDA 5/9/2023 <7.00 ppt 7.00 ppt Not Detected
PFTA 5/9/2023 <8.00 ppt 8.00 ppt Not Detected
ADONA 5/9/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
6:2 FTS 12/18/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
NMeFOSAA 12/18/2023 <6.00 ppt 6.00 ppt Not Detected
PFUnA 12/18/2023 <2.00 ppt 2.00 ppt Not Detected
ADONA 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFBS 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHpA 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxS 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFOA 12/18/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFOS 12/18/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
NEtFOSAA 12/18/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFTrDA 12/18/2023 <7.00 ppt 7.00 ppt Not Detected
PFTA 12/18/2023 <8.00 ppt 8.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxA 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFPeA 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
HFPO-DA 12/18/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFNA 12/18/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMPA 12/18/2023 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFDoA 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS 12/18/2023 <2.00 ppt 2.00 ppt Not Detected
PFBA 12/18/2023 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMBA 12/18/2023 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected

Verify This Water System

The figures above are aggregated from EPA's public databases. To verify the underlying records, or to file a complaint, request a Consumer Confidence Report, or check current monitoring status, go directly to the federal and state regulators that enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act for Ontario City.

Federal Source of Truth

EPA SDWIS, Federal Reports

EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) holds the federal compliance record for every regulated public water system. Open the system-level report by PWS ID:

View PWS ID OH7003512 on SDWIS

Source: EPA SDWIS Federal Reports Search

State Regulator

Ohio Drinking Water Authority

Ohio EPA, Division of Drinking and Ground Waters is the primacy agency that licenses and inspects Ontario City under EPA-delegated authority.

Open OH regulator portal

Source: Ohio EPA, Division of Drinking and Ground Waters

Violation Timeline

Each row links to the EPA SDWIS public record for verification. Cross-reference the contaminant code on EPA's federal report to see violation dates, return-to-compliance status, and enforcement actions.

Year (latest) Contaminant Category Count EPA Record
2018 Consumer Confidence Rule Other 3 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 7000
1999 Nitrate MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1040
1998 Coliform (TCR) MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 3100
1995 Asbestos MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1094
1995 Arsenic MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1005
1995 Barium MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1010
1995 Cadmium MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1015
1995 Chromium MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1020
1995 Fluoride MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1025
1995 Mercury MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1035
1995 Nickel MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1036
1995 Selenium MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1045
1995 Thallium, Total MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1085
1995 Beryllium, Total MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1075
1995 CYANIDE MR 4 SDWIS / OH7003512 / 1024

How Ontario City Compares

Cross-reference this system's record against state averages and the federal MCL framework for context.

Metric Ontario City Ohio avg Federal benchmark
Total violations 67 69 SDWA compliance, any non-zero count is a recorded breach
Health-based violations 0 12.5 Indicates a contaminant exceeded a federal MCL
PFAS detection None 59% EPA final rule (2024): PFOA/PFOS MCL = 4.0 ppt
Population served 6,656 2,651 Sizing context for compliance burden

Sources: EPA SDWIS and EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (40 CFR Part 141). State averages computed across 4,181 regulated public water systems in Ohio.

Federal MCL reference, Safe Drinking Water Act thresholds
Contaminant Federal MCL / Action Level Note
Lead 0 mg/L (Action Level: 0.015 mg/L) Lead and Copper Rule treatment technique
Arsenic 0.010 mg/L (10 ppb) Health-based MCL since 2006
Total Coliform Treatment technique (RTCR) Indicator organism, monitoring trigger
PFOA / PFOS (PFAS) 4.0 ppt each (final 2024 rule) Compliance deadline 2029 (EPA proposed extending to 2031, not yet final as of May 2026)
Nitrate (as N) 10 mg/L Acute health risk for infants

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ontario City water safe to drink?
Ontario City (PWS ID: OH7003512) has 67 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing. This system serves 6,656 people using Groundwater sources.
How many people does Ontario City serve?
Ontario City serves 6,656 people in Ontario, Ohio. It is a Local-owned system using Groundwater water sources with 2,684 service connections.
What type of violations does Ontario City have?
Ontario City has 67 total violations: 0 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 64 monitoring/reporting violations, and 0 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.
Has PFAS been detected in Ontario City water?
No. Ontario City was tested for PFAS under the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program and no PFAS contamination was detected.
What water source does Ontario City use?
Ontario City uses Groundwater as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.
Where does this data come from?
All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Data Sources: EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), Q4 2025. PFAS data from EPA UCMR5 monitoring program (2023-2025). This data is provided for informational purposes only.
Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater Editorial

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This system's figures are rendered directly from EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.