PlainWater

Community Water System · PWS MT0000016

Anaconda Water Department

Operator location Anaconda, Montana - larger served population (> 3,309) at 6,750 people served; 58 SDWIS violations on record from groundwater sources.

6,750
People served (this PWS) Larger third of systems
58
EPA violations (this PWS) Middle third of systems
7
Health-based (this PWS) Middle third by health-based share
No PFAS
UCMR5 (this PWS) Tested, none detected
Follow published updates (RSS)

Anaconda Water Department standing, mid SDWIS violation third

6,750 people served (SDWIS) - larger served population (> 3,309). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 12% is middle-third health share (≤ 23%). UCMR5: UCMR5 tested, none detected. Population rank #6,280 of 29,740 among systems serving 500+.

The verdict

Anaconda Water Department lands in the middle third by violation volume (58), large enough for peer comparisons without matching the fleet's heaviest ledgers. Population served is large (6,750; larger served population (> 3,309)), so household exposure scale sits behind the violation mix. Health-based share is 12% (middle-third health share (≤ 23%)). UCMR5 tested this system and reported no PFAS above the minimum reporting level.

#6,280 of 29,740
Population · /systems
#19 of 283
Population · MT
58
Total EPA violations on record
12%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)

Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.

F
Water Safety Score
28/100
Anaconda Water Department

Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.

Health-based violations F
7
EPA SDWIS health-based violations on record (MCL, MRDL, treatment technique)
Monitoring & reporting violations F
51
Non-health SDWIS violations (monitoring, reporting, and other compliance)
PFAS contamination N/A
Tested, none detected
Highest PFAS compound level detected in UCMR5 testing

System Details

System Type
Community
Owner Type
Local
Connections
2,866
County
Deer Lodge
School/Daycare
No
MCL Violations
6
Monitoring Violations
51
Treatment Tech Violations
1

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant Category Count Latest
Coliform (TCR) MR 10 1998
Coliform (TCR) MCL 6 1995
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MR 6 2006
TTHM MR 6 2006
E. COLI MR 3 2023
Surface Water Treatment Rule TT 1 1992
Aldicarb sulfoxide MR 1 2001
Chlordane MR 1 2001
BHC-GAMMA MR 1 2001
Simazine MR 1 2001
Dalapon MR 1 2001
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate MR 1 2001
2,4-D MR 1 2001
Heptachlor epoxide MR 1 2001
Aldicarb MR 1 2001
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate MR 1 2001
HEXACHLOROBENZENE MR 1 2001
Carbofuran MR 1 2001
Heptachlor MR 1 2001
Pentachlorophenol MR 1 2001
Toxaphene MR 1 2001
2,4,5-TP MR 1 2001
Dinoseb MR 1 2001
Atrazine MR 1 2001
Methoxychlor MR 1 2001
LASSO MR 1 2001
Benzo(a)pyrene MR 1 2001
Picloram MR 1 2001
Aldicarb sulfone MR 1 2001
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene MR 1 2001

Violation Count vs. the National Corpus

Anaconda Water Department has 58 recorded EPA violations, 60% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 39% carry more. 12% of this system's own violations are health-based (7 of 58), and it ranks #6,280 of 29,740 by population served among that same cohort.

EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus

Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)

58 Around the middle fewer violations than 39% of 29,740 water systems

the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15

How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems

Anaconda Water Department plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.

Violation volume vs. health-based share

30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Total violations (X) and Health-based share (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Frequent and seriousRare but seriousFrequent, mostly paperworkClean record 0200400600 0%20%40%60%80%100% Total violations Health-based share Violation volume vs. health-based share Miccosukee Service Plaza-0, 0%Brazoria - Fort Bend Counties MUD 3-0, 0%Tanglewilde Thompson Place 600-2, 0%Center Water Co-5, 0%Montgomery Co RWD 12-7, 29%Spring Mills Elem School/Hvs-9, 0%Irvin Water District #6-11, 27%Great Bend Industrial Park-14, 0%Nooksack Valley Water Association-16, 31%Glen Park Village-19, 0%Camp Is-Sho-Da-22, 0%Kipling Oaks 1-25, 16%McLouth, City Of-29, 17%Hamilton-33, 0%Pine Valley Plantation-37, 24%Lake Gibson Estates-42, 2%Ticonderoga WD-47, 26%Town of Welaka-54, 0%Township of Blairstown Dpw-61, 0%McIntosh Water & Fire Pro Authority-71, 0%Sunset Ridge Water District-82, 15%South Deerfield Water Supply District-96, 16%Clarkdale Municipal Water System-114, 0%Orange Water Dept-136, 14%Mount Pleasant Water Sys #1-167, 11%Benson Culinary Improvement District-212, 1%Eureka Water Association-273, 0%City of Ballinger-372, 85%Conemaugh Twp Muni Auth-567, 1%Anaconda Water Department-58, 12%
30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release.

PFAS Testing Results (UCMR5)

Results from EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule. 0 of 58 samples detected PFAS.

Contaminant Date Result MRL Status
PFPeA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFDoA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHpS 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFPeS 9/17/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
NFDHA 9/17/2024 <20.00 ppt 20.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMBA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMPA 9/17/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
8:2 FTS 9/17/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
4:2 FTS 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
6:2 FTS 9/17/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFBA 9/17/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
HFPO-DA 9/17/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
ADONA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHpA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFOS 9/17/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFEESA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
9Cl-PF3ONS 9/17/2024 <2.00 ppt 2.00 ppt Not Detected
PFOA 9/17/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFNA 9/17/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxS 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFBS 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFDA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
NMeFOSAA 9/17/2024 <6.00 ppt 6.00 ppt Not Detected
NEtFOSAA 9/17/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFTrDA 9/17/2024 <7.00 ppt 7.00 ppt Not Detected
PFTA 9/17/2024 <8.00 ppt 8.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxA 9/17/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFUnA 9/17/2024 <2.00 ppt 2.00 ppt Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS 9/17/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFUnA 3/13/2024 <2.00 ppt 2.00 ppt Not Detected
PFPeS 3/13/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
NFDHA 3/13/2024 <20.00 ppt 20.00 ppt Not Detected
PFEESA 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMBA 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFPeA 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFMPA 3/13/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
8:2 FTS 3/13/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
4:2 FTS 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
6:2 FTS 3/13/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFBA 3/13/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
HFPO-DA 3/13/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
ADONA 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHpS 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS 3/13/2024 <5.00 ppt 5.00 ppt Not Detected
PFDoA 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxA 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFDA 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected
PFOS 3/13/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFNA 3/13/2024 <4.00 ppt 4.00 ppt Not Detected
PFHxS 3/13/2024 <3.00 ppt 3.00 ppt Not Detected

Population served record for Anaconda Water Department

EPA SDWIS lists 6,750 people served and 2,866 connections for this PWS, confirm the service-area footprint on the federal report before comparing to municipal census totals.

Sources: EPA SDWIS

Nationwide peers

58 violations · 6,750 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.

Cross-state systems near this violation count

Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by total SDWIS violations on record.

4 peers

Cross-state systems with similar served population

Nearest cross-state systems by EPA SDWIS population_served (same 500+ sitemap gate).

4 peers

What to do with Anaconda Water Department

Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.

  • See how every tracked system in Montana compares on the same EPA violation measures. Montana systems
  • Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
  • Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems

EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.