Community Water System · PWS DC0000001
Washington Aqueduct Division.
Washington, District of Columbia 20016 - drinking water served from surface water sources to 0 people, tracked in EPA SDWIS and UCMR5.
- 0
- People served
- 13
- EPA violations
- 5
- Health-based
- Untested
- UCMR5 result
The verdict
EPA records 13 drinking-water violations at Washington Aqueduct Division., 38% of them health-based - below the District of Columbia per-system average.
- 13
- Total EPA violations on record
- 38%
- Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)
- 0
- People served by this system
- N/A
- PFAS compounds detected (UCMR5)
Water Quality Snapshot: Washington Aqueduct Division.
Washington Aqueduct Division. is a federal-owned community water system that delivers drinking water to 0 residents in Washington, District of Columbia (District of Columbia County) through 3 service connections. Its water is drawn from surface water sources. EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System records 13 total violations for this system , of which 5 (38%) are health-based, meaning a contaminant exceeded an EPA Maximum Contaminant Level or a required treatment technique failed. A further 7 monitoring and reporting violations are on file. The most recent violation on record dates to 2020.
The most frequently cited contaminant at this system is Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, recorded in 6 violations (MR). This system has not yet been sampled under EPA's UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program, so no PFAS detection data is available here.
Across District of Columbia, EPA tracks 5 public water systems serving 667,575 people, with 263 cumulative violations and 72 health-based violations on record. About 100% of systems in the state carry at least one violation, and state-wide the average per system is 52.6 violations. Statewide, 3 of 3 UCMR5-tested systems have reported PFAS detections (100%).
Washington Aqueduct Division.'s 13 violations sit below the District of Columbia average.
All figures above are sourced directly from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 public data releases and are updated as EPA publishes new reporting cycles.
System Details
- System Type
- Community
- Owner Type
- Federal
- Connections
- 3
- County
- District of Columbia
- School/Daycare
- No
- MCL Violations
- 3
- Monitoring Violations
- 7
- Treatment Tech Violations
- 2
Violation History
Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.
| Contaminant | Category | Count | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | MR | 6 | 2020 |
| Coliform (TCR) | MCL | 3 | 1993 |
| Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | TT | 2 | 2008 |
| Glyphosate | MR | 1 | 2003 |
Verify This Water System
The figures above are aggregated from EPA's public databases. To verify the underlying records, or to file a complaint, request a Consumer Confidence Report, or check current monitoring status, go directly to the federal and state regulators that enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act for Washington Aqueduct Division..
EPA SDWIS, Federal Reports
EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) holds the federal compliance record for every regulated public water system. Open the system-level report by PWS ID:
View PWS ID DC0000001 on SDWISSource: EPA SDWIS Federal Reports Search
District of Columbia Drinking Water Authority
District of Columbia's primacy agency administers the Safe Drinking Water Act locally. Search EPA SDWIS for the current state contact, or use the state's public health or environment department portal.
Find DC regulator via EPA SDWISViolation Timeline
Each row links to the EPA SDWIS public record for verification. Cross-reference the contaminant code on EPA's federal report to see violation dates, return-to-compliance status, and enforcement actions.
| Year (latest) | Contaminant | Category | Count | EPA Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | MR | 6 | SDWIS / DC0000001 / 0300 |
| 2008 | Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule | TT | 2 | SDWIS / DC0000001 / 0300 |
| 2003 | Glyphosate | MR | 1 | SDWIS / DC0000001 / 2034 |
| 1993 | Coliform (TCR) | MCL | 3 | SDWIS / DC0000001 / 3100 |
How Washington Aqueduct Division. Compares
Cross-reference this system's record against state averages and the federal MCL framework for context.
| Metric | Washington Aqueduct Division. | District of Columbia avg | Federal benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total violations | 13 | 52.6 | SDWA compliance, any non-zero count is a recorded breach |
| Health-based violations | 5 | 14.4 | Indicates a contaminant exceeded a federal MCL |
| PFAS detection | None | 100% | EPA final rule (2024): PFOA/PFOS MCL = 4.0 ppt |
| Population served | 0 | 133,515 | Sizing context for compliance burden |
Sources: EPA SDWIS and EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (40 CFR Part 141). State averages computed across 5 regulated public water systems in District of Columbia.
Federal MCL reference, Safe Drinking Water Act thresholds ▼
| Contaminant | Federal MCL / Action Level | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0 mg/L (Action Level: 0.015 mg/L) | Lead and Copper Rule treatment technique |
| Arsenic | 0.010 mg/L (10 ppb) | Health-based MCL since 2006 |
| Total Coliform | Treatment technique (RTCR) | Indicator organism, monitoring trigger |
| PFOA / PFOS (PFAS) | 4.0 ppt each (final 2024 rule) | Compliance deadline 2029 (EPA proposed extending to 2031, not yet final as of May 2026) |
| Nitrate (as N) | 10 mg/L | Acute health risk for infants |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Washington Aqueduct Division. water safe to drink? ▼
How many people does Washington Aqueduct Division. serve? ▼
What type of violations does Washington Aqueduct Division. have? ▼
Has PFAS been detected in Washington Aqueduct Division. water? ▼
What water source does Washington Aqueduct Division. use? ▼
Where does this data come from? ▼
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This system's figures are rendered directly from EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.