Is Cabazon Water District water safe to drink?

Cabazon Water District (PWS ID: CA3310047) has 59 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing. EPA SDWIS lists this system's service population as 2,010 people using Groundwater sources.

How many people does Cabazon Water District serve?

EPA SDWIS reports that Cabazon Water District serves 2,010 people (this public water system's service population, not the municipal population of Cabazon or any other city). It is a Local-owned system using Groundwater water sources with 948 service connections. The operator address is listed in Cabazon, California.

What type of violations does Cabazon Water District have?

Cabazon Water District has 59 total violations: 10 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 49 monitoring/reporting violations, and 2 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.

Has PFAS been detected in Cabazon Water District water?

No PFAS testing data is available for Cabazon Water District under the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program.

What water source does Cabazon Water District use?

Cabazon Water District uses Groundwater as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Where does Cabazon Water District sit among U.S. public water systems?

According to EPA SDWIS population_served among sitemap-advertised systems (serving 500+), Cabazon Water District ranks #13,493 of 29,740 by people served, and #893 of 1,701 in California. Ordinals use population_served DESC among systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). See /methodology#corpus-placement.

How does Cabazon Water District's violation count compare nationally?

Cabazon Water District has 59 recorded EPA SDWIS violations, fewer than 39% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500 or more people nationwide (the same sitemap cohort used for the corpus-placement ranking above). 61% of that cohort has fewer violations than Cabazon Water District. A system can have zero recorded violations and still be actively monitored, and a high violation count often reflects a system that reports thoroughly, not necessarily one with worse water.

States → California

Community Water System · PWS CA3310047

Cabazon Water District

Operator location Cabazon, California - 17% of 59 violations are health-based (middle-third health share (≤ 23%)); groundwater source; 2,010 served per SDWIS.

Compiled by PlainWater · May 15, 2026

2,010
People served (this PWS) Middle third of systems: 59
EPA violations (this PWS) Middle third of systems: 10
Health-based (this PWS) Middle third by health-based share: Untested
UCMR5 (this PWS) No UCMR5 result

Follow published updates (RSS)

Cabazon Water District standing, mid SDWIS violation third

17% of 59 recorded violations are health-based - middle-third health share (≤ 23%). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 17% is middle-third health share (≤ 23%). Population rank #13,493 of 29,740 among systems serving 500+.

The verdict

Cabazon Water District lands in the middle third by violation volume (59), large enough for peer comparisons without matching the fleet's heaviest ledgers. Population served is mid-pack at 2,010 (mid served population (≤ 3,309)). Health-based share is 17% (middle-third health share (≤ 23%)). No UCMR5 PFAS test appears for this system in this extract.

#13,493 of 29,740
Population · /systems: #893 of 1,701
Population · CA: 59
Total EPA violations on record: 17%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)

Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.

Water Safety Score

25/100

Cabazon Water District

Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.

Health-based violations F

EPA SDWIS health-based violations on record (MCL, MRDL, treatment technique)

Monitoring & reporting violations F

Non-health SDWIS violations (monitoring, reporting, and other compliance)

PFAS contamination N/A

Not UCMR5-tested

Highest PFAS compound level detected in UCMR5 testing

System Details

System Type: Community
Owner Type: Local
Connections: 948
County: Riverside
School/Daycare: No
MCL Violations: 8
Monitoring Violations: 49
Treatment Tech Violations: 2

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant	Category	Count	Latest
Coliform (TCR)	MCL	8	2013
Coliform (TCR)	MR	6	2002
Nitrate	MR	6	2013
Lead and Copper Rule	MR	5	2011
TTHM	MR	2	2006
Surface Water Treatment Rule	TT	2	1993
Arsenic	MR	2	2009
Chromium	MR	2	2009
Mercury	MR	2	2009
Nitrite	MR	2	2009
Beryllium, Total	MR	2	2009
Thallium, Total	MR	2	2009
Selenium	MR	2	2009
Fluoride	MR	2	2009
ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE	MR	2	2006
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE	MR	2	2006
Barium	MR	2	2009
E. COLI	MR	2	2013
Nickel	MR	2	2009
Cadmium	MR	2	2009
Antimony, Total	MR	2	2009

Violation Count vs. the National Corpus

Cabazon Water District has 59 recorded EPA violations, 61% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 39% carry more. 17% of this system's own violations are health-based (10 of 59), and it ranks #13,493 of 29,740 by population served among that same cohort.

EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus

Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)

59 Around the middle fewer violations than 39% of 29,740 water systems

the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15

How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems

Cabazon Water District plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.

30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release.

How to read this

Each dot is one public water system; the highlighted dot is Cabazon Water District. A system to the right has more recorded violations; a system higher up has a larger share of those violations classified health-based rather than monitoring or reporting.

Rare but serious: few violations, but most of them are health-based.
Frequent, mostly paperwork: many violations, but mostly monitoring or reporting, not health-based.
Clean record: below-median on both counts, the tinted corner.

View all 30 systems as a list

City of Ballinger: 372 violations, 85% health-based
Nooksack Valley Water Association: 16 violations, 31% health-based
Montgomery Co RWD 12: 7 violations, 29% health-based
Irvin Water District #6: 11 violations, 27% health-based
Ticonderoga WD: 47 violations, 26% health-based
Pine Valley Plantation: 37 violations, 24% health-based
McLouth, City Of: 29 violations, 17% health-based
Cabazon Water District: 59 violations, 17% health-based (this system)
Kipling Oaks 1: 25 violations, 16% health-based
South Deerfield Water Supply District: 96 violations, 16% health-based
Sunset Ridge Water District: 82 violations, 15% health-based
Orange Water Dept: 136 violations, 14% health-based
Mount Pleasant Water Sys #1: 167 violations, 11% health-based
Lake Gibson Estates: 42 violations, 2% health-based
Benson Culinary Improvement District: 212 violations, 1% health-based
Conemaugh Twp Muni Auth: 567 violations, 1% health-based
Miccosukee Service Plaza: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Brazoria - Fort Bend Counties MUD 3: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Tanglewilde Thompson Place 600: 2 violations, 0% health-based
Center Water Co: 5 violations, 0% health-based
Spring Mills Elem School/Hvs: 9 violations, 0% health-based
Great Bend Industrial Park: 14 violations, 0% health-based
Glen Park Village: 19 violations, 0% health-based
Camp Is-Sho-Da: 22 violations, 0% health-based
Hamilton: 33 violations, 0% health-based
Town of Welaka: 54 violations, 0% health-based
Township of Blairstown Dpw: 61 violations, 0% health-based
McIntosh Water & Fire Pro Authority: 71 violations, 0% health-based
Clarkdale Municipal Water System: 114 violations, 0% health-based
Eureka Water Association: 273 violations, 0% health-based

Health-based violations on Cabazon Water District

10 health-based rows in the tables above map to MCL or treatment-technique exceedances, verify each contaminant code on the federal SDWIS report for CA3310047.

EPA SDWIS · PWS CA3310047 CA primacy agency

Sources: EPA SDWIS · California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water

Nationwide peers

59 violations · 2,010 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.

Cross-state systems near this violation count

Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by total SDWIS violations on record.

4 peers

Cross-state systems near this population served

Nearest cross-state systems by EPA SDWIS population_served (same 500+ sitemap gate).

4 peers

What to do with Cabazon Water District

Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.

See how every tracked system in California compares on the same EPA violation measures. California systems
Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems

EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Compiled by PlainWater, Drinking Water Quality Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.