Is Silver Creek RV Park water safe to drink?

Silver Creek RV Park (PWS ID: AZ0408064) has 240 recorded violations in the EPA SDWIS database. No PFAS contamination was detected in UCMR5 testing. EPA SDWIS lists this system's service population as 280 people using Groundwater sources.

How many people does Silver Creek RV Park serve?

EPA SDWIS reports that Silver Creek RV Park serves 280 people (this public water system's service population, not the municipal population of Bullhead City or any other city). It is a Public/Private-owned system using Groundwater water sources with 141 service connections. The operator address is listed in Bullhead City, Arizona.

What type of violations does Silver Creek RV Park have?

Silver Creek RV Park has 240 total violations: 62 health-based violations (MCL exceedances or treatment failures), 115 monitoring/reporting violations, and 0 treatment technique violations. Health-based violations indicate contaminant levels exceeded EPA safe limits.

Has PFAS been detected in Silver Creek RV Park water?

No PFAS testing data is available for Silver Creek RV Park under the EPA's UCMR5 monitoring program.

What water source does Silver Creek RV Park use?

Silver Creek RV Park uses Groundwater as its primary water source. It is classified as a Community Water System (CWS), serving residential populations year-round.

Where does this data come from?

All data comes from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the UCMR5 PFAS monitoring program. SDWIS tracks compliance for all public water systems regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

How does Silver Creek RV Park's violation count compare nationally?

Silver Creek RV Park has 240 recorded EPA SDWIS violations, fewer than 12% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500 or more people nationwide (the same sitemap cohort used for the corpus-placement ranking above). 88% of that cohort has fewer violations than Silver Creek RV Park. A system can have zero recorded violations and still be actively monitored, and a high violation count often reflects a system that reports thoroughly, not necessarily one with worse water.

States → Arizona

Community Water System · PWS AZ0408064

Silver Creek RV Park

Operator location Bullhead City, Arizona - 26% of 240 violations are health-based (upper-third health share (> 23%)); groundwater source; 280 served per SDWIS.

Compiled by PlainWater · May 15, 2026

280
People served (this PWS) Smaller third of systems: 240
EPA violations (this PWS) Upper third of systems: 62
Health-based (this PWS) Upper third by health-based share: Untested
UCMR5 (this PWS) No UCMR5 result

Follow published updates (RSS)

Silver Creek RV Park standing, high SDWIS violation third

26% of 240 recorded violations are health-based - upper-third health share (> 23%). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 26% is upper-third health share (> 23%).

The verdict

Silver Creek RV Park sits in the upper third of the sitemap cohort by violation count (240), so the tables below sample a dense compliance trail rather than a near-clean ledger. Population served is smaller (280; smaller served population (≤ 999)), so each violation row represents a compact service footprint. Health-based share is 26% - most of this ledger is MCL or treatment-technique exceedance. No UCMR5 PFAS test appears for this system in this extract.

240
Total EPA violations on record: 26%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure): 280
People served by this PWS (SDWIS): N/A
PFAS compounds detected (UCMR5)

Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.

Water Safety Score

3/100

Silver Creek RV Park

Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.

Health-based violations F

EPA SDWIS health-based violations on record (MCL, MRDL, treatment technique)

Monitoring & reporting violations F

178

Non-health SDWIS violations (monitoring, reporting, and other compliance)

PFAS contamination N/A

Not UCMR5-tested

Highest PFAS compound level detected in UCMR5 testing

System Details

System Type: Community
Owner Type: Public/Private
Connections: 141
County: Mohave
School/Daycare: No
MCL Violations: 62
Monitoring Violations: 115
Treatment Tech Violations: 0

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant	Category	Count	Latest
Nitrate	MCL	62	2023
Consumer Confidence Rule	Other	40	2017
Nitrate	MR	31	2023
Lead and Copper Rule	MR	21	2024
Coliform (TCR)	MR	11	2015
Public Notice	Other	9	2024
Revised Total Coliform Rule	RPT	8	2024
Carbon tetrachloride	MR	2	2001
1,2-Dichloropropane	MR	2	2001
Trichloroethylene	MR	2	2001
Benzene	MR	2	2001
p-Dichlorobenzene	MR	2	2001
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene	MR	2	2001
1,2-Dichloroethane	MR	2	2001
Styrene	MR	2	2001
o-Dichlorobenzene	MR	2	2001
Mercury	MR	2	1988
Selenium	MR	2	1988
Barium	MR	2	1988
Cadmium	MR	2	1988
Chromium	MR	2	1988
Toluene	MR	2	2001
CHLOROBENZENE	MR	2	2001
DICHLOROMETHANE	MR	2	2001
Arsenic	MR	2	1988
1,1,1-Trichloroethane	MR	2	2001
Tetrachloroethylene	MR	2	2001
Ethylbenzene	MR	2	2001
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene	MR	2	2001
1,1-Dichloroethylene	MR	2	2001

Violation Count vs. the National Corpus

Silver Creek RV Park has 240 recorded EPA violations, 88% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 12% carry more. 26% of this system's own violations are health-based (62 of 240), and it ranks unranked by population served among that same cohort.

EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus

Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)

240 Higher than most more violations than 88% of 29,740 water systems

the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15

How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems

Silver Creek RV Park plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.

30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release.

How to read this

Each dot is one public water system; the highlighted dot is Silver Creek RV Park. A system to the right has more recorded violations; a system higher up has a larger share of those violations classified health-based rather than monitoring or reporting.

Rare but serious: few violations, but most of them are health-based.
Frequent, mostly paperwork: many violations, but mostly monitoring or reporting, not health-based.
Clean record: below-median on both counts, the tinted corner.

View all 30 systems as a list

City of Ballinger: 372 violations, 85% health-based
Nooksack Valley Water Association: 16 violations, 31% health-based
Montgomery Co RWD 12: 7 violations, 29% health-based
Irvin Water District #6: 11 violations, 27% health-based
Ticonderoga WD: 47 violations, 26% health-based
Silver Creek RV Park: 240 violations, 26% health-based (this system)
Pine Valley Plantation: 37 violations, 24% health-based
McLouth, City Of: 29 violations, 17% health-based
Kipling Oaks 1: 25 violations, 16% health-based
South Deerfield Water Supply District: 96 violations, 16% health-based
Sunset Ridge Water District: 82 violations, 15% health-based
Orange Water Dept: 136 violations, 14% health-based
Mount Pleasant Water Sys #1: 167 violations, 11% health-based
Lake Gibson Estates: 42 violations, 2% health-based
Benson Culinary Improvement District: 212 violations, 1% health-based
Conemaugh Twp Muni Auth: 567 violations, 1% health-based
Miccosukee Service Plaza: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Brazoria - Fort Bend Counties MUD 3: 0 violations, 0% health-based
Tanglewilde Thompson Place 600: 2 violations, 0% health-based
Center Water Co: 5 violations, 0% health-based
Spring Mills Elem School/Hvs: 9 violations, 0% health-based
Great Bend Industrial Park: 14 violations, 0% health-based
Glen Park Village: 19 violations, 0% health-based
Camp Is-Sho-Da: 22 violations, 0% health-based
Hamilton: 33 violations, 0% health-based
Town of Welaka: 54 violations, 0% health-based
Township of Blairstown Dpw: 61 violations, 0% health-based
McIntosh Water & Fire Pro Authority: 71 violations, 0% health-based
Clarkdale Municipal Water System: 114 violations, 0% health-based
Eureka Water Association: 273 violations, 0% health-based

Health-based violations on Silver Creek RV Park

62 health-based rows in the tables above map to MCL or treatment-technique exceedances, verify each contaminant code on the federal SDWIS report for AZ0408064.

EPA SDWIS · PWS AZ0408064 AZ primacy agency

Sources: EPA SDWIS · Arizona DEQ, Drinking Water Program

Nationwide peers

240 violations · 280 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.

Cross-state systems with comparable violation load

Nearest cross-state community systems (500+ served) by total SDWIS violations on record.

4 peers

What to do with Silver Creek RV Park

Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.

See how every tracked system in Arizona compares on the same EPA violation measures. Arizona systems
Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems

EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Compiled by PlainWater, Drinking Water Quality Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.