PlainWater

Community Water System · PWS AZ0405001

Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas

Operator location Pima, Arizona - 0% of 152 violations are health-based (lower-third health share (≤ 1%)); groundwater source; 452 served per SDWIS.

452
People served (this PWS) Smaller third of systems
152
EPA violations (this PWS) Upper third of systems
0
Health-based (this PWS) Lower third by health-based share
Untested
UCMR5 (this PWS) No UCMR5 result
Follow published updates (RSS)

Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas standing, high SDWIS violation third

0% of 152 recorded violations are health-based - lower-third health share (≤ 1%). Corpus terciles use 29,740 systems serving 500+ (the sitemap cohort). Health-based share 0% is lower-third health share (≤ 1%).

The verdict

Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas sits in the upper third of the sitemap cohort by violation count (152), so the tables below sample a dense compliance trail rather than a near-clean ledger. Population served is smaller (452; smaller served population (≤ 999)), so each violation row represents a compact service footprint. Health-based share is only 0% - almost all of this trail is monitoring or reporting. No UCMR5 PFAS test appears for this system in this extract.

152
Total EPA violations on record
0%
Health-based (MCL / treatment failure)
452
People served by this PWS (SDWIS)
N/A
PFAS compounds detected (UCMR5)

Population ordinals match the sitemap cohort (systems serving 500+, population_served DESC). See methodology · corpus placement.

C+
Water Safety Score
61/100
Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas

Based on EPA SDWIS violation history and UCMR5 PFAS testing only, not water taste, odor, infrastructure age, or contaminants outside the federally tracked set.

Health-based violations A+
0
EPA SDWIS health-based violations on record (MCL, MRDL, treatment technique)
Monitoring & reporting violations F
152
Non-health SDWIS violations (monitoring, reporting, and other compliance)
PFAS contamination N/A
Not UCMR5-tested
Highest PFAS compound level detected in UCMR5 testing

System Details

System Type
Community
Owner Type
Private
Connections
187
County
Graham
School/Daycare
No
MCL Violations
0
Monitoring Violations
115
Treatment Tech Violations
0

Violation History

Contaminant violations recorded by EPA.

Contaminant Category Count Latest
Chlorine MR 29 2021
Coliform (TCR) MR 16 2016
Consumer Confidence Rule Other 15 2025
Lead and Copper Rule MR 7 2023
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) MR 6 2010
TTHM MR 4 2010
Revised Total Coliform Rule RPT 4 2021
Nitrate MR 3 2006
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene MR 1 1998
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene MR 1 1998
p-Dichlorobenzene MR 1 1998
1,2-Dichloroethane MR 1 1998
Carbon tetrachloride MR 1 1998
1,1,2-Trichloroethane MR 1 1998
Styrene MR 1 1998
Benzene MR 1 1998
Endrin MR 1 1998
BHC-GAMMA MR 1 1998
Dalapon MR 1 1998
Diquat MR 1 1998
Endothall MR 1 1998
Glyphosate MR 1 1998
Simazine MR 1 1998
Picloram MR 1 1998
Dinoseb MR 1 1998
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene MR 1 1998
Atrazine MR 1 1998
LASSO MR 1 1998
2,3,7,8-TCDD MR 1 1998
2,4-D MR 1 1998

Violation Count vs. the National Corpus

Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas has 152 recorded EPA violations, 81% of the 29,740 public water systems serving 500+ people nationwide carry fewer, and 19% carry more. 0% of this system's own violations are health-based (0 of 152), and it ranks unranked by population served among that same cohort.

EPA violations vs. the national water-system corpus

Public water systems serving 500+ people (EPA SDWIS)

152 Higher than most more violations than 81% of 29,740 water systems

the national water-system corpus, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more water systems. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA SDWIS · 2026-05-15

How many violations vs. how serious, among peer systems

Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas plotted against 29 peer public water systems (500+ people served), by total violation count (x) and the share of those violations that are health-based (y). The crosshair sits at this sample's own median on each axis. A high violation count does not automatically mean a serious record: most monitoring and reporting violations are minor, not health-based.

Violation volume vs. health-based share

30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Total violations (X) and Health-based share (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Frequent and seriousRare but seriousFrequent, mostly paperworkClean record 0200400600 0%20%40%60%80%100% Total violations Health-based share Violation volume vs. health-based share Miccosukee Service Plaza-0, 0%Brazoria - Fort Bend Counties MUD 3-0, 0%Tanglewilde Thompson Place 600-2, 0%Center Water Co-5, 0%Montgomery Co RWD 12-7, 29%Spring Mills Elem School/Hvs-9, 0%Irvin Water District #6-11, 27%Great Bend Industrial Park-14, 0%Nooksack Valley Water Association-16, 31%Glen Park Village-19, 0%Camp Is-Sho-Da-22, 0%Kipling Oaks 1-25, 16%McLouth, City Of-29, 17%Hamilton-33, 0%Pine Valley Plantation-37, 24%Lake Gibson Estates-42, 2%Ticonderoga WD-47, 26%Town of Welaka-54, 0%Township of Blairstown Dpw-61, 0%McIntosh Water & Fire Pro Authority-71, 0%Sunset Ridge Water District-82, 15%South Deerfield Water Supply District-96, 16%Clarkdale Municipal Water System-114, 0%Orange Water Dept-136, 14%Mount Pleasant Water Sys #1-167, 11%Benson Culinary Improvement District-212, 1%Eureka Water Association-273, 0%City of Ballinger-372, 85%Conemaugh Twp Muni Auth-567, 1%Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas-152, 0%
30 public water systems (500+ people served), EPA SDWIS current release.

Health-based violations on Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas

0 health-based rows in the tables above map to MCL or treatment-technique exceedances, verify each contaminant code on the federal SDWIS report for AZ0405001.

Sources: EPA SDWIS · Arizona DEQ, Drinking Water Program

Nationwide peers

152 violations · 452 served: nearest cross-state SDWIS matches.

What to do with Graham County Utilities-Fort Thomas

Use this system's EPA-reported record as a starting filter, not a final verdict.

  • See how every tracked system in Arizona compares on the same EPA violation measures. Arizona systems
  • Check whether PFAS was detected at this system under UCMR5 testing. PFAS guide
  • Find and compare another public water system by name or PWSID. Search systems

EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 figures are informational only, not a substitute for a certified lab test of your own tap water.

Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.