PlainWater
Counties10

County 10039 County, 10

SDWIS compliance plate

Sheet 10039 · County 10039 County 4 sys · 205 viol · #3241/3254

VIOL-SEVERE · HEALTH-LOW · RANK-BOTTOM · GAP-SOLO · PFAS-NONE · SRC-GW · SYS-TINY · BOOK-MOST

  • VIOL-SEVERE 100.0% flagged
  • HEALTH-LOW 9.8% health
  • RANK-BOTTOM #3241/3254
  • GAP-SOLO No peers
  • PFAS-NONE No UCMR5 set
  • SRC-GW GW lead 100%
  • SYS-TINY 4 systems
  • BOOK-MOST 6/7 fields

According to EPA SDWIS county population served used on /counties, County 10039 County ranks #3,241 of 3,254 counties by people served, and #24 of 25 counties in 10. See methodology · corpus placement.

County 10039 County standing, mid-flagged corpus third

Flagged-system rate 100.0% is in the corpus middle third (≤ 100.0% flagged) across 2,973 counties with ≥3 SDWIS systems . Health-based share 9.8% is health-based share at or below the lower third (≤ 10.3%) . No UCMR5 tests in this extract for County 10039 County . Population served ranks #3,241 of 3,254 · #24 of 25 in 10.

Water Systems

System Name Population Violations PFAS
Georgeville 70 136 -
Maryhill Tfas 39 19 -
Lyle Tfas 33 19 -
Pasture Point Tfas 25 31 -

Compare beyond 10

Mid-flagged peers for County 10039 County

Cross-state counties nearest County 10039 County on flagged-system share (100.0%) and cumulative violation count (205). In-state neighbours stay on the compliance plate above.

Similar flagged-system rate

Nearest cross-state counties by % of SDWIS systems with at least one violation on record.

4 peers

Similar violation load

Nearest cross-state counties by cumulative SDWIS violation count (all systems in the county).

4 peers
Data sourced from EPA SDWIS and UCMR5 PFAS monitoring data. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainWater

Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.