County 09107 County, 09
SDWIS compliance plate
Sheet 09107 · County 09107 County 2 sys · 786 viol · #3019/3254
VIOL-SEVERE · HEALTH-LOW · RANK-BOTTOM · GAP-SOLO · PFAS-NONE · SRC-SW · SYS-TINY · BOOK-MOST
- VIOL-SEVERE 100.0% flagged
- HEALTH-LOW 3.9% health
- RANK-BOTTOM #3019/3254
- GAP-SOLO No peers
- PFAS-NONE No UCMR5 set
- SRC-SW SW lead 50%
- SYS-TINY 2 systems
- BOOK-MOST 6/7 fields
According to EPA SDWIS county population served used on /counties, County 09107 County ranks #3,019 of 3,254 counties by people served, and #22 of 31 counties in 09. See methodology · corpus placement.
County 09107 County standing, mid-flagged corpus third
Flagged-system rate 100.0% is in the corpus middle third (≤ 100.0% flagged) across 2,973 counties with ≥3 SDWIS systems . Health-based share 3.9% is health-based share at or below the lower third (≤ 10.3%) . No UCMR5 tests in this extract for County 09107 County . Population served ranks #3,019 of 3,254 · #22 of 31 in 09.
Water Systems
| System Name | Population | Violations | PFAS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tule River Reservation Main | 2,560 | 662 | - |
| Tule River Apple Valley | 25 | 124 | - |
Compare beyond 09
Mid-flagged peers for County 09107 County
Cross-state counties nearest County 09107 County on flagged-system share (100.0%) and cumulative violation count (786). In-state neighbours stay on the compliance plate above.
Similar violation load
Nearest cross-state counties by cumulative SDWIS violation count (all systems in the county).
Read our methodology · Check your water system - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.