Cedar County, Nebraska
SDWIS compliance plate
Sheet NE027 · Cedar County 18 sys · 1,068 viol · #2548/3254
VIOL-SEVERE · HEALTH-HIGH · RANK-LOWER · PHOTO-FINISH · PFAS-NONE · SRC-GW · SYS-SMALL · BOOK-MOST
- VIOL-SEVERE 100.0% flagged
- HEALTH-HIGH 81.7% health
- RANK-LOWER #2548/3254
- PHOTO-FINISH ±0.0 pp
- PFAS-NONE No UCMR5 set
- SRC-GW GW lead 72%
- SYS-SMALL 18 systems
- BOOK-MOST 6/7 fields
Nearest flagged-rate peer: Otoe County (+ 0 pp flagged-rate)
According to EPA SDWIS county population served used on /counties, Cedar County ranks #2,548 of 3,254 counties by people served, and #31 of 93 counties in Nebraska. See methodology · corpus placement.
Cedar County standing, mid-flagged corpus third
Flagged-system rate 100.0% is in the corpus middle third (≤ 100.0% flagged) across 2,973 counties with ≥3 SDWIS systems . Health-based share 81.7% is health-based share above the upper third (> 24.5%) . No UCMR5 tests in this extract for Cedar County . Population served ranks #2,548 of 3,254 · #31 of 93 in Nebraska.
Flagged-rate neighbourhood around Cedar County
Lowest/highest poles plus in-state counties nearest Cedar County on % of SDWIS systems with ≥1 violation. Full ladder: /counties.
Water Systems
| System Name | Population | Violations | PFAS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar-Knox Rural Water Project | 2,500 | 198 | - |
| Hartington, City Of | 1,436 | 28 | - |
| Laurel, City Of | 972 | 106 | - |
| Randolph, City Of | 944 | 39 | - |
| Coleridge, Village Of | 533 | 43 | - |
| Wau Col RWS - East Side | 260 | 15 | - |
| Wynot, Village Of | 220 | 68 | - |
| Sportsmans Corner - Cedar | 200 | 39 | - |
| Fordyce, Village Of | 135 | 120 | - |
| Bow Valley Water Works | 120 | 8 | - |
| Belden, Village Of | 112 | 225 | - |
| St Helena, Village Of | 89 | 8 | - |
| Obert, Village Of | 58 | 55 | - |
| Magnet, Village Of | 52 | 77 | - |
| Brooky Bottom Recreation Dev H O A | 50 | 11 | - |
| Haberman's | 25 | 16 | - |
| Eagles Roost Resort | 25 | 8 | - |
| Meridian Bridge R. V. Resort | 25 | 4 | - |
Compare beyond Nebraska
Mid-flagged peers for Cedar County
Cross-state counties nearest Cedar County on flagged-system share (100.0%) and cumulative violation count (1,068). In-state neighbours stay on the compliance plate above.
Similar flagged-system rate
Nearest cross-state counties by % of SDWIS systems with at least one violation on record.
Similar violation load
Nearest cross-state counties by cumulative SDWIS violation count (all systems in the county).
Read our methodology · Check your water system - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainWater is rendered directly from EPA SDWIS drinking-water data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on EPA SDWIS data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.